Robot Motion Control Using Harmonic Radar Collision Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety systems in robotic work environments fail to effectively prevent human injury by allowing close proximity operation with robots, leading to potential accidents due to latency in data processing and large robot size, which can result in delayed reaction times.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a radar transmitter, harmonic receiver, and harmonic reflector to track and predict the position, speed, and direction of objects within the robot's operative range, enabling the control unit to regulate robot operation by restricting or stopping it when necessary to prevent collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional safety systems (fencing, laser curtains, weight detecting mats) are used to prevent human injury, then safety is improved, but productivity deteriorates because humans cannot work in close proximity to robots

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidproduction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical safety systems (fencing, physical barriers, weight detecting mats) with a radar-based detection system that uses electromagnetic waves to monitor human presence and robot motion, enabling close proximity collaboration without physical constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces radar signals as an intermediary to indirectly detect human presence and robot motion, allowing the system to respond to potential hazards before physical contact occurs, thus enabling safe close-proximity work

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If line-of-sight imaging devices are used to detect human presence, then safety is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to restricted workspace access and required line-of-sight

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidworkspace accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces line-of-sight imaging devices with radar technology that can detect objects through walls and obstacles, eliminating the requirement for direct visual contact and enabling detection in non-line-of-sight conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The radar system serves multiple functions: detecting human presence, tracking robot motion, and providing early hazard warning, making it more versatile than specialized imaging devices that only detect visible objects within direct line-of-sight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If large industrial robots are used to increase production capability, then productivity is improved, but safety deteriorates due to increased mass and longer stopping time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capabilityVSAvoidsafety response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The radar system performs preliminary detection of human presence and tracks robot motion continuously, providing early warning before a collision hazard develops, allowing the robot to begin deceleration earlier to compensate for its larger mass and longer stopping distance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time feedback from radar signals to continuously monitor the relative position and velocity between the robot and human, enabling dynamic adjustment of robot speed to ensure safe operation despite the robot's large mass

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If data processing latency is reduced to improve safety response time, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety response timeVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential safety-critical parameters (human presence detection, relative position, velocity) from the radar signal data, processing only what is necessary for safety decisions rather than analyzing all available data, thus reducing processing latency without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables safe human-robot collaboration by allowing operation in non-line-of-sight environments, providing real-time safety responses to potential collisions, and ensuring the robot stops or slows down before contact, thus enhancing safety and productivity.

Implementation Method 1

A radar transmitter is configured to output a radar signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

The control unit may be configured to determine the position, the speed, and the direction of the harmonic reflector based on a Doppler effect of the harmonic signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Implementation Method 3

A harmonic reflector is configured to be coupled to an object. The harmonic reflector is configured to output the harmonic signal in response to the radar signal contacting the harmonic reflector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHarmonic reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4644950A1System and method for controlling operation of a robot
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 THE BOEING CO
  • EP4644950A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4644950A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4644950A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system (100) and a method include a robot (102). A radar transmitter (110) is configured to output a radar signal (120). A harmonic receiver (112) is configured to receive a harmonic signal (122). A harmonic reflector (116) is configured to be coupled to an object (114). The harmonic reflector (116) is configured to output the harmonic signal (122) in response to the radar signal (120) contacting the harmonic reflector (116). A control unit (108) is in communication with the robot (102), the radar transmitter (110), and the harmonic receiver (112). The control unit (108) is configured to determine a position, a speed, and a direction of the harmonic reflector (116) based on the harmonic signal (122), and regulate operation of the robot (102) based on the position, the speed, and direction of the harmonic reflector (116).