Multi-Modal Robot Hazard Mapping for Semantic Obstacle Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hazard detection techniques for robots struggle to accurately identify and navigate around obstacles, particularly those with similar geometries, and often require resource-intensive manual processes that are inefficient and incomplete.

Innovation Solution

A legged robot equipped with sensors providing color and depth images, utilizing a multi-modal open vocabulary object detection model that combines segmentation with depth information to generate hazard maps, allowing for autonomous navigation with updated navigational maps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional hazard detection techniques are used, then the robot can identify obstacles, but the detection accuracy is insufficient particularly for obstacles with similar geometries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection accuracyVSAvoidability to distinguish different hazard types
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image data into multiple regions corresponding to different hazards, allowing the system to analyze each segment individually with specialized models. This segmentation enables precise identification of different hazard types (e.g., cables, steps, holes) by applying appropriate detection strategies to each segment, thereby improving both detection accuracy and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates depth information from depth images as an additional dimension beyond traditional 2D color images. By fusing color and depth data, the system creates multi-dimensional hazard representations that enable better distinction between obstacles with similar geometries but different depth characteristics, significantly improving detection precision and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If manual hazard identification processes are used, then comprehensive hazard coverage can be achieved, but the process is resource-intensive and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard identification completenessVSAvoidhazard detection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through autonomous hazard detection where the robot's system automatically identifies, segments, and classifies hazards without manual intervention. The multi-modal machine learning models process sensor data autonomously to generate hazard maps and navigation paths, achieving both comprehensive hazard coverage and high efficiency by eliminating resource-intensive manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical hazard identification processes with automated computational systems. Instead of human operators manually analyzing environments, the system uses multi-modal machine learning models that process color and depth images computationally to detect and classify hazards, dramatically improving productivity while maintaining reliability through algorithmic consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If simple geometric obstacle detection is used, then the system is computationally efficient, but it cannot provide semantic information about hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsemantic hazard information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges geometric detection with semantic analysis by integrating color image segmentation and depth information processing. The system combines multiple data modalities (color, depth, segmentation masks) to simultaneously achieve computational efficiency through geometric constraints and rich semantic information through multi-modal fusion, resolving the trade-off between processing speed and information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite hazard representations by fusing multiple data types (color image segments, depth information, semantic labels) into a unified hazard map. This composite approach allows the system to maintain computational efficiency from geometric processing while enriching the data with semantic information from multi-modal analysis, achieving both speed and information retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20260054392A1Semantic robot hazard avoidance with multi-modal prompting
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 BOSTON DYNAMICS INC
  • US20260054392A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054392A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054392A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for semantic robot hazard avoidance with multi-modal prompting are provided. In one aspect, a method includes receiving a user input indicative of one or more hazards in an environment of the robot and image data indicative of the one or more hazards in the environment. The method also includes generating one or more segments of the image data. Each of the one or more segments corresponds to at least one of the one or more hazards indicated by the user input. The method further includes identifying a semantic label for each of the one or more segments, generating a hazard map including a location of each of the one or more segments and the corresponding semantic label, and navigating the robot through the environment based at least in part on the hazard map.