Dual-Axis Robot Head Control for Animal-Like Emotional Responses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robots lack the ability to mimic animalistic behaviors and emotional responses effectively, particularly in interacting with users through rotational movements and sound reactions, limiting their ability to simulate real animal-like interactions.

Innovation Solution

A robot design featuring a head and body that can rotate independently about two axes, equipped with sensors and motors to detect user interactions and emit sounds, using predefined control schemes and tables to execute various animal-like behaviors and emotional responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the robot uses a dog-like shape with body, head, and four legs to represent animalistic behaviors, then the robot can move the head and legs relative to the body to simulate various behaviors, but the robot lacks the ability to effectively mimic emotional responses and rotational movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to mimic animalistic behaviorsVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot is divided into distinct functional modules: a body portion, a head portion with rotational mechanisms, and a sound output unit. The head can independently rotate about vertical and lateral axes, allowing segmented control of different body parts to achieve diverse animalistic behaviors without requiring complete structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The head portion is designed with multi-axis rotational capability and integrated sound output, enabling it to perform multiple functions: visual engagement through rotation, auditory communication through sound emission, and combined behaviors that simulate various animal actions. This universal design reduces the need for separate specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the robot adds sensors and motors to detect user interactions and emit sounds, then the robot can execute various animal-like behaviors and emotional responses, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to execute animal-like behaviorsVSAvoidcomponent complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor unit and sound output unit are integrated with the rotational mechanisms in the head portion, combining detection and actuation functions in a unified structure. This merging reduces the number of separate components and simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining diverse behavioral capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The robot uses its own rotational movements and sound emissions to respond to user interactions, creating self-contained behavioral loops. The system processes user input and generates appropriate animal-like responses through its integrated components without requiring external control systems, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the robot uses predefined control schemes with turn control to rotate the head about two axes, then the robot can simulate emotional responses through rotational movements, but the control system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to simulate emotional responsesVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The head rotation is controlled through periodic turn operations about the vertical axis followed by turns about the lateral axis, creating rhythmic patterns that simulate natural animal behaviors. This periodic control structure simplifies the control logic by using repeating sequences rather than complex continuous control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system pre-defines turn schemes for head rotation, establishing predetermined rotational paths and sequences before execution. This preliminary programming of motion patterns allows the robot to simulate emotional responses through consistent, reproducible movements without requiring real-time complex calculations during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11786831B2Robot
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 CASIO COMPUTER CO LTD
  • US11786831B2 patent drawing
  • US11786831B2 patent drawing
  • US11786831B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot includes a body contactable with a placement surface, a head, at least one actuator, and at least one processor. The head is contactable with the placement surface, and is coupled to a front end of the body so as to be rotatable about a first rotational axis extending in a front-rear direction of the body and rotatable about a second rotational axis extending in a width direction of the body. The at least one actuator turns the head by causing the head to make a turn about the first rotational axis and a turn about the second rotational axis independently of each other. The at least one processor repeats a first turn control scheme and a second turn control scheme in sequence.