Integrated Robot Joint Module With Shared Housing Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial robot arms require a more integrated and cost-effective joint module design to handle heavy loads and complex operations, with existing designs often having separate components that complicate assembly and increase costs.

Innovation Solution

The integrated joint module incorporates a housing, driving assembly, speed reduction assembly, braking assembly, and encoding assembly, where the housing serves as a shell structure for the driving assembly, and the speed reduction and braking assemblies are connected to the output shaft, with the encoding assembly arranged on the braking assembly, simplifying the structure and reducing costs by allowing direct mounting of components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If separate components are used for driving assembly, speed reduction assembly, braking assembly, and encoding assembly, then each component can be independently manufactured and maintained, but the overall structure becomes complex and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIndependent manufacturing capabilityVSAvoidOverall structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the housing of the driving assembly to also serve as the housing for the speed reduction assembly, braking assembly, and encoding assembly. This merging of housing structures reduces the total number of components and simplifies the overall structure while maintaining independent functionality of each assembly, directly addressing the contradiction between independent manufacturability and structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If separate housings are used for each assembly, then each assembly can be independently assembled and tested, but the total number of parts increases and costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIndependent assembly capabilityVSAvoidTotal number of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate housings into a single integrated housing structure that accommodates the driving assembly, speed reduction assembly, braking assembly, and encoding assembly. This reduces the quantity of parts while preserving independent assembly capabilities through modular internal configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated housing serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides structural support for the driving assembly, contains the speed reduction mechanism, supports the braking assembly, and protects the encoding assembly. This multi-functionality reduces the total part count while maintaining operational independence of each subsystem

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If traditional separate component design is used, then reliability of individual components can be optimized independently, but assembly complexity and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveComponent reliabilityVSAvoidAssembly structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple assembly housings into one integrated structure that maintains distinct functional zones for each assembly (driving, speed reduction, braking, encoding). This allows each component to be optimized for reliability independently while reducing overall assembly complexity through the unified housing structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design simplifies the joint module's structure, reduces costs, and enhances the robot arm's ability to handle heavy loads and complex operations by providing a more integrated and efficient assembly process.

Implementation Method 1

an area of a cross section of the pair of the contact surfaces perpendicular to the axial direction of the output shaft gradually increases or decreases along the axial direction of the output shaft. The base is configured to provide a pressing force to the pair of contact surfaces along the axial direction of the output shaft after being fixed, to allow the rotating shaft to rotate with the output shaft under an action of a friction between the pair of contact surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12179343B2Industrial robot arm and integrated joint module
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 SHENZHEN YUEJIANG TECH CO LTD
  • US12179343B2 patent drawing
  • US12179343B2 patent drawing
  • US12179343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated joint module includes a housing, a driving assembly, a speed reduction assembly, a braking assembly and an encoding assembly. The housing includes a first housing and a second housing, an annular supporting platform is arranged on an inner side of the first housing. The driving assembly includes an output shaft, a stator embedded in the annular supporting platform, and a rotor connected with the output shaft and arranged on an inner side of the stator, the speed reduction assembly and the braking assembly are connected with two ends of the output shaft. The encoding assembly is arranged on a side of the braking assembly away from the driving assembly and connected with the output shaft, the second housing is sleeved on the encoding assembly and connected with the first housing. The integrated joint module helps to simplify the structure of the joint module and reduce the cost.