Robot Landing Zone Evaluation Using Tessellated Ground Cells

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomy systems in robotics are limited in extensibility and adaptability, as they are typically designed to address only one aspect of robot operation and are not well-equipped for rapid adaptation to new platforms or the addition of new modules, restricting their ability to support diverse mission sets and environments.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that tessellates a ground region into cells based on terrain data, evaluates feasibility for robot landing, and ranks sub-regions using a cost metric to select the most suitable area for landing, enabling flexible and adaptive autonomy in various environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If existing autonomy systems are designed to address only one aspect of robot operation, then the system design can be focused and simplified, but the extensibility and adaptability to new platforms and modules are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem design complexityVSAvoidextensibility to new platforms
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal autonomy system architecture that can handle multiple aspects of robot operation (navigation, obstacle avoidance, task execution) within a single integrated framework. The system uses a common cost metric evaluation approach that can accommodate different robot types and mission requirements, enabling the same core system to be extended to new platforms and modules without redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If existing autonomy systems are designed for a narrow mission set, then the system can be optimized for specific tasks, but the ability to support diverse mission sets and environments is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution reliabilityVSAvoidsupport for diverse mission sets
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains reliability across diverse missions by dynamically adjusting evaluation parameters and cost metrics based on the specific mission requirements and environmental conditions. The autonomy system can change parameters such as cost metric weights, evaluation criteria, and operational constraints to optimize performance for different mission types while maintaining a unified architectural framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240310185A1Evaluation of a ground region for landing a robot
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 AURORA FLIGHT SCIENCES CORP
  • US20240310185A1 patent drawing
  • US20240310185A1 patent drawing
  • US20240310185A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of supporting robot(s) landing within a ground region is provided. The method includes accessing a map in which the ground region is tessellated into cells covering respective areas of the ground region. Each cell is classified as feasible to indicate a respective area is feasible for landing, or infeasible to indicate the respective area is infeasible for landing. The map is searched for clusters of adjoining cells that are classified as feasible, covering clusters of adjoining areas that define sub-regions within the ground region that are feasible for landing. The sub-regions are ranked according to a cost metric, and one of the sub-regions is selected according to the ranking. A geographic position of the selected sub-region is then output for use in at least one of guidance, navigation or control of the robot(s) to land at the selected sub-region within the ground region.