Industrial Robot Manipulator Trajectory Control for Dynamic Load Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing industrial robot manipulators are limited by conservative design choices that reduce their workspace and payload capacity due to static load assumptions, failing to utilize their full potential and compromising mechanical integrity.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling the manipulator by determining position-dependent loads and modifying trajectories to optimize performance parameters, such as speed and acceleration, based on dynamic load considerations, allowing for an extended workspace and increased payload without compromising mechanical component lifetime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If worst case constant limits are chosen for each mechanical component, then structural integrity is ensured, but workspace is significantly reduced and maximum payload is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidworkspace
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static constant load limits to dynamic position-dependent load limits. The control system calculates varying load limits based on the manipulator's current position and configuration, allowing the workspace to be extended while maintaining structural integrity. This is achieved by determining position-dependent load values and using them to modify candidate trajectories, enabling the manipulator to operate in previously restricted areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of load limits from constant values to position-dependent variable values. By calculating load limits as a function of manipulator position and configuration, the system optimizes the balance between structural integrity and workspace utilization. This parameter transformation allows dynamic adjustment of operational constraints based on actual mechanical conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If worst case constant limits are chosen for each mechanical component, then structural integrity is ensured, but maximum payload is significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmaximum payload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts payload capacity based on manipulator position and configuration. By calculating position-dependent load limits, the control system allows the manipulator to carry heavier payloads in positions where the mechanical structure can support them, while maintaining safety margins in positions where structural loads are higher. This dynamic approach maximizes payload utilization without compromising structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the payload parameter from a fixed conservative limit to a variable position-dependent limit. The control system calculates the maximum allowable payload at each position based on the manipulator's configuration and structural capacity, enabling optimal payload utilization across the entire workspace while ensuring structural integrity is maintained at all times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of stationary object

If conservative maximum values are defined for payload, speed, acceleration and position, then mechanical component lifetime is ensured, but full potential of the manipulator is not utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical component lifetimeVSAvoidfull potential utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by replacing static conservative limits with dynamic position-dependent load limits. The control system calculates optimal speed and acceleration profiles based on the manipulator's current position and the corresponding load limits, allowing full utilization of mechanical component capacity while ensuring lifetime requirements are met. This dynamic optimization enables the manipulator to operate at maximum potential in safe regions while maintaining protective margins in critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of speed and acceleration from fixed conservative values to variable values that depend on manipulator position. By calculating position-dependent load limits and adjusting operational parameters accordingly, the system maximizes productivity while ensuring mechanical component lifetime is preserved through appropriate safety margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12472626B2Method of controlling manipulator of industrial robot, control system and industrial robot
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US12472626B2 patent drawing
  • US12472626B2 patent drawing
  • US12472626B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a manipulator of an industrial robot having a plurality of joints, the method including providing a candidate trajectory for the manipulator; determining at least one position dependent load value representative of at least one position dependent load acting on the manipulator for the candidate trajectory; modifying the candidate trajectory based on the at least one position dependent load value to provide a modified trajectory; and executing the modified trajectory by the manipulator. A control system for controlling a manipulator of an industrial robot having a plurality of joints, and an industrial robot including a manipulator and a control system, are also provided.