Robot Operation Learning With Encoders for Sparse Observations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data-driven learning methods for robot operation using tactile and visual sensors face challenges with sparse information input, leading to reduced robustness and generalization performance due to partial observations and occlusions.

Innovation Solution

An operation method learning system that utilizes a combination of encoders and contrastive learning to process sparse data, including a query encoder, temporal encoder, and key encoder, along with reinforcement learning to determine robot actions, enhancing the learning process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If tactile sensors and cameras are used to observe robot state, then observation capability is improved, but information sparsity increases due to partial contact points and occlusions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobservation capabilityVSAvoidinformation sparsity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The observation data is segmented into multiple feature amounts through different encoders (first encoder for spatial features, second encoder for temporal features). This segmentation allows the system to process and reconstruct complete object information from sparse tactile contact points and partial camera views by dividing the observation task into manageable feature extraction components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms sparse 2D camera images and 1D tactile sensor signals into a richer feature space by extracting multiple feature amounts across different dimensions (spatial, temporal, contact force). This dimensional transformation enables the system to infer complete 3D object information from limited observations by adding temporal and spatial context dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If data-driven learning methods are used, then robustness and generalization performance are improved within learning data range, but performance deteriorates when input information is sparse

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverobustnessVSAvoidsparse information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from multiple feature amounts extracted by different encoders to iteratively refine the reconstructed object information. The first encoder provides spatial feedback, the second encoder provides temporal feedback, and their combined output feeds into the determination unit, creating a feedback loop that enhances robustness against sparse input by continuously refining predictions based on multiple observation dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The encoders perform preliminary feature extraction and organization before the final determination is made. By pre-processing sparse observations into structured feature amounts (spatial features from first encoder, temporal features from second encoder), the system prepares enhanced representations that improve downstream task performance even when original input data is incomplete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple encoders and contrastive learning are used, then learning accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The first encoder and second encoder are designed as universal feature extraction components that can process different types of sparse observations (tactile data, camera images) and produce standardized feature amounts. This multi-functionality allows the same encoder architecture to handle various sensor inputs and task requirements, reducing overall system complexity despite using multiple encoders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The feature amounts extracted by the encoders serve as intermediaries between raw sparse observations and final task execution. Instead of directly processing complex raw sensor data, the system uses these intermediate feature representations (spatial features, temporal features) as mediators that simplify the learning process and reduce the complexity burden on the determination unit and reinforcement learning components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250299045A1Operation method learning system, operation method learning method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20250299045A1 patent drawing
  • US20250299045A1 patent drawing
  • US20250299045A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An operation method learning system acquires observed data of a robot at a first time, calculates a first feature amount based on the observed data using a first encoder, calculate a second feature amount at the first time based on an action of the robot at a second time, a second feature amount at the second time, and the first feature amount at the first time using a recursive second encoder that holds the second feature amount at the second time, determines an action of the robot at the first time on the basis of the second feature amount at the first time, and learns at least the first encoder and the second encoder using contrastive learning.