Robot Parameter Learning With Vibration-Based Early Suspension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robot operation parameter learning techniques require extensive time as they perform all predetermined operations within the learned allowable range from start to end, leading to inefficient learning processes.

Innovation Solution

An operation parameter adjusting method that involves detecting vibration in a robot system, executing adjustment operations with candidate parameter values, optimizing these parameters based on detection values, and determining the optimal parameters by repeating the process while suspending operations that exceed reference values, thereby reducing the time required for adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all predetermined operations are performed in the learning process, then the operation allowable range can be learned, but the learning time becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation allowable range learning accuracyVSAvoidlearning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively suspending detection processing for operations that have already met reference values, rather than performing all predetermined operations. This reduces the learning time while maintaining sufficient learning accuracy for the operation allowable range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback mechanisms by comparing detection values with reference values during the learning process. Based on this comparison, the system dynamically determines whether to continue or suspend detection processing, enabling adaptive learning that balances accuracy and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If detection processing is performed for all adjustment operations, then complete operation parameter optimization is achieved, but the adjustment time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation parameter optimization completenessVSAvoidparameter adjustment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs detection processing only for necessary operations by suspending processing for operations that have already met reference values. This partial action approach maintains sufficient optimization reliability while significantly improving parameter adjustment speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the detection processing into multiple independent steps, allowing selective suspension of individual steps based on whether reference values have been met. This segmentation enables flexible control over the optimization process to balance completeness and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of time

If the detecting step is suspended early, then the adjustment time is reduced, but the operation parameter determination accuracy may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment timeVSAvoidoperation parameter determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from comparing detection values with reference values to dynamically control the suspension of detection processing. This feedback mechanism ensures that suspension decisions are made only when sufficient data has been collected, maintaining determination accuracy while reducing unnecessary processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic control over the detection processing duration. Rather than using a fixed number of steps, the system adaptively determines when to suspend processing based on real-time comparison results, optimizing the balance between time efficiency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method reduces the time needed for adjusting operation parameters by selectively executing only necessary operations, improving the efficiency of the learning process and optimizing robot performance.

Implementation Method 1

a detecting section configured to detect vibration of the robot

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS12145274B2Operation parameter adjusting method and operation parameter adjusting device for adjusting operation parameters of robot
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US12145274B2 patent drawing
  • US12145274B2 patent drawing
  • US12145274B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An operation parameter adjusting method according to an aspect includes a detecting step for causing a robot to execute a plurality of adjustment operations using candidate values of operation parameters and acquiring detection values of a detecting section, an operation parameter updating step for executing optimization processing for the operation parameters using the acquired detection values to thereby obtain new candidate values of the operation parameters, a repeating step for repeating the operation parameter updating step and the detecting step, and an operation parameter determining step for determining, based on one or more candidate values of the operation parameters obtained by the repeating step, the operation parameter used in the robot system. The detecting step includes a suspension determining step for performing continuation or suspension of the detecting step based on a result of comparison of the acquired detection values of the part of the adjustment operations and a reference value.