Robot Path Correction for Workpiece Position Changes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial robots face challenges in efficiently correcting their operations when workpiece positions change, requiring extensive expertise and time for re-teaching, which degrades accuracy and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A robot system with a memory for automatic operation information, an operation controlling module that selects between automatic and correctable automatic modes, and a manipulator for generating corrective manipulation information, allowing real-time correction of robot operations by changing positional coordinates while retaining some original operation elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If teaching is performed again to change the teaching information used for automatic operation of the robot, then the robot operation can be corrected to adapt to position changes, but the time and effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to position changesVSAvoidtime for re-teaching
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the operation information into multiple positions (first position, second position, third position) along the operation path. By allowing independent correction of each position's coordinates, the system enables partial updates rather than complete re-teaching, significantly reducing the time and effort required while maintaining adaptability to position changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary correction of position coordinates based on detected position changes before executing the corrected operation. The system automatically calculates corrected coordinates for the second position based on the detected change from the first position, preparing the corrected operation information in advance without requiring time-consuming re-teaching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If complete re-teaching is performed to correct robot operation, then accuracy can be maintained, but the complexity and burden on the teaching person increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of workVSAvoidcomplexity of correction process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by correcting only the necessary position coordinates (specifically the second position) rather than performing complete re-teaching of all operation parameters. This partial correction maintains work accuracy while significantly reducing the complexity and burden on the teaching person.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system detects position changes by comparing the actual position with the taught position and uses this feedback to automatically calculate corrected coordinates. This feedback mechanism enables accurate correction without requiring expert intervention, reducing both complexity and burden on the teaching person.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the robot operation is corrected in real-time based on position changes, then efficiency is maintained, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity for real-time correction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting position changes and calculating corrected coordinates without requiring external intervention. The robot system corrects its own operation information based on detected position deviations, maintaining operational efficiency while avoiding the complexity of additional correction systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical re-teaching processes with computational methods. Instead of manual re-teaching, the system uses coordinate calculations and information processing to automatically generate corrected operation data, maintaining efficiency while reducing system complexity through software-based solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11964391B2Robot system
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KK
  • US11964391B2 patent drawing
  • US11964391B2 patent drawing
  • US11964391B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot system includes a robot body, a memory, an operation controlling module and a manipulator. When the robot body is located at a first position, the operation controlling module stops the robot body and receives a selecting manipulation of operation mode from the manipulator. When a correctable automatic mode is selected at the first position, the operation controlling module makes positional coordinates of a second position provided downstream of the first position in a moving direction, changeable from the second position in automatic operation information. When the positional coordinates of the second position are changed, the operation controlling module corrects the automatic operation information so that the robot body reaches the changed second position while retaining some of elements of the automatic operation information in the correctable automatic mode.