Robot Authorization via Physical Manipulation and Parameter Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robot control and modification techniques often fail to authorize users based on physical interaction, and they do not adapt physical control parameters to user preferences effectively, limiting the robot's functionality and user experience.

Innovation Solution

The method involves authorizing robot functionalities through physical manipulation by a user, using specific authorization positions, orientations, velocities, and accelerations, and adapting physical control parameters based on user preferences, which are identified through sensor data and user interface inputs, allowing for secure and personalized robot operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If robot functionalities are restricted to control and modification by authorized users via separate computing devices or fingerprint sensors, then security and authorization control are improved, but the ability to authorize users based on physical interaction with the robot is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization controlVSAvoidphysical interaction authorization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary authorization system that bridges the gap between secure access control and physical interaction. The robot controller acts as a mediator that receives sensor data from physical interaction sensors, compares it against stored authorization parameters, and selectively activates functionalities based on the match. This intermediary layer maintains security while enabling physical interaction-based authorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The robot performs self-authorization verification by comparing sensor data from physical interactions against its own stored authorization parameters. The system uses its internal processors and stored parameters to autonomously determine whether a user is authorized, eliminating the need for external computing devices or separate authentication systems for this specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If robots enable physical manipulation during training mode, then ease of operation and training capability are improved, but the ability to adapt physical control parameters based on user preferences is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical manipulationVSAvoidphysical control parameter adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of physical control parameters during physical manipulation. The robot controller continuously monitors sensor data from physical interactions and adjusts control parameters in real-time based on the detected user preferences and authorization level. This dynamic adjustment allows the robot to adapt its mechanical response, impedance, and movement characteristics during training mode operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where sensor data from physical manipulation is continuously fed back to the robot controller. The controller compares this feedback against stored authorization parameters and user preferences, then adjusts physical control parameters accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables the robot to learn and adapt to individual user preferences during training mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If authorization parameters include specific positions, orientations, velocities, and accelerations for physical manipulation, then measurement precision and authorization accuracy are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization parameter precisionVSAvoidauthorization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by storing multiple sets of authorization parameters corresponding to different functionalities and user levels. The robot controller dynamically selects and applies appropriate parameter sets based on the detected physical interaction and authorization match. This approach enables precise control over positions, orientations, velocities, and accelerations without requiring a completely separate complex system for each parameter type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10019566B1Authorizing robot use and/or adapting physical control parameters for a robot
Publication Date: 2018.07.10 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US10019566B1 patent drawing
  • US10019566B1 patent drawing
  • US10019566B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Some aspects are related to methods and apparatus that enable authorization of one or more functionalities of a robot based on a user physically manipulating the robot. For example, an authorization for a robot may include one or more authorization parameters associated with physical manipulation of the robot and sensor data generated in response to physical manipulation of the robot by a user may be utilized to determine if the physical manipulation conforms to the authorization parameters. If conformance is determined, one or more functionalities of the robot may be activated. Some implementations additionally and/or alternatively relate to methods and apparatus for adapting one or more physical control parameters for a robot based on preferences of a user of the robot, such as a user that is currently authorized for the robot.