Autonomous Robot Pose Determination for Flexible Object Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous robots struggle to adapt to unexpected changes in their environment, requiring precise knowledge of object locations and loading processes, leading to inefficiencies and manual intervention when objects are not exactly where expected.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a 3D map updated in real-time by a central communication system and robots, allowing robots to identify objects and determine their pose without needing micro-level precision, enabling autonomous operation and flexibility in unloading tasks without prior knowledge of loading processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If robots use micro-level precision (1-2 cm) to locate objects, then object identification accuracy is improved, but system adaptability deteriorates when objects shift positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject location precisionVSAvoidadaptability to position changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the precision requirement from micro-level (1-2 cm) to macro-level (half object dimension) based on the task context. The robot uses vision systems to identify objects at macro-level precision, then uses grippers with compliance control to adapt to the actual object position and orientation, eliminating the need for micro-level positioning precision while maintaining task completion capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the precision parameter from 1-2 cm to half the object dimension (e.g., 40 cm for an 80 cm wide pallet). This parameter change is supported by combining vision-based macro-level localization with compliant gripper control, allowing the system to work with reduced precision requirements while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If robots require exact knowledge of loading processes, then task execution reliability is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot performs self-calibration by approaching the object and using its vision system to automatically identify the object's actual position, orientation, and dimensions. The compliant gripper automatically adapts to the object's characteristics during approach and contact. This self-service capability eliminates the need for external systems to provide detailed loading process information, reducing system complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses vision feedback to detect the object's actual state and adjusts the gripper's approach and grasping force accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the robot to adapt to unknown loading configurations without requiring prior knowledge, maintaining reliability while avoiding the complexity of pre-programming all possible loading scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If robots expend fuel attempting failed tasks, then productivity deteriorates, but measurement precision requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidposition precision requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial action by using vision systems to identify objects at macro-level precision (half object dimension) rather than requiring full micro-level precision (1-2 cm). This partial precision approach is sufficient for successful task completion when combined with compliant gripper control, preventing wasted fuel on failed attempts while reducing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11524846B2Pose determination by autonomous robots in a facility context
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 GIDEON BROTHERS D O O
  • US11524846B2 patent drawing
  • US11524846B2 patent drawing
  • US11524846B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method are disclosed where an autonomous robot captures an image of an object to be transported from a source to a destination. The robot generates a bounding box within the image surrounding the object. The robot applies a machine-learned model to the image with the bounding box, the machine-learned model configured to identify an object type of the object, and to identify features of the object based on the identified object type and the image. The robot determines which of the identified features of the object are visible to the autonomous robot, and determines a three-dimensional pose of the object based on the features determined to be visible to the autonomous robot.