Collaborative Robot Proximity Control for Qualified Worker Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Collaborative robots face productivity issues when operating in environments with unknown or varying numbers of people, as they often need to limit their driving to avoid collisions, leading to reduced efficiency and productivity.

Innovation Solution

A robot system that includes a specifying section to identify individuals within a predetermined range and a control section to decelerate or stop the robot's operation, with the ability to adjust the distance based on the specified person's proficiency or qualification, allowing authorized personnel to work closer to the robot while maintaining safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the robot limits its driving when an unidentified person is detected, then safety is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to frequent deceleration and stopping

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different control strategies to different types of detected persons. Identified persons (registered in advance) allow the robot to maintain normal operation, while unidentified persons trigger safety protocols. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction by applying safety measures only where necessary rather than universally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control section dynamically adjusts the robot's operation based on real-time detection results. When an unidentified person is detected, the robot decelerates or stops; when only identified persons are present, the robot maintains normal speed. This dynamic response optimizes both safety and productivity by avoiding unnecessary deceleration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the robot operates at high speed in environments with many people, then productivity is improved, but collision risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of persons in the workspace before the robot operates at high speed. Persons are registered in advance as identified individuals. This preliminary action allows the robot to maintain high speed when only identified persons are present, reducing collision risk through advance preparation rather than reactive slowing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The specifying section continuously provides feedback about the presence and identity of persons in the workspace. The control section uses this feedback to adjust operation speed in real-time, maintaining high speed when safe and reducing speed when unidentified persons are detected, thus managing collision risk dynamically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11565418B2Robot system
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US11565418B2 patent drawing
  • US11565418B2 patent drawing
  • US11565418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot system includes a robot configured to operate in cooperation with a person, a specifying section configured to specify a person present in a region at a predetermined distance from the robot, and a control section configured to decelerate or stop the operation of the robot when the presence of the person in the region is specified by the specifying section. The control section changes the distance based on a result of specifying the person by the specifying section.