Autonomous Mobile Robot Remote Control With Location-Aware Messaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous mobile service robots face challenges in secure and reliable remote control and monitoring, as existing solutions are susceptible to hacking and provide irrelevant information to users, especially when the robot is unable to perform tasks due to environmental obstacles like closed doors, and do not efficiently adapt to user location for message relevance.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows autonomous mobile service robots to communicate with mobile devices through both indirect internet relayed connections and local wireless connections, automatically switching between them, and includes a navigation module to detect user presence and adapt task execution accordingly, ensuring secure and relevant information exchange.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If internet relayed connection is used for remote control, then control over long distance is enabled, but security against hacking is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote control capabilityVSAvoidcommunication security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A communication server acts as an intermediary between the mobile device and the robot. The server relays control commands and status information, enabling remote control while maintaining security through centralized authentication and encrypted communication channels. The server verifies device credentials before allowing control connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If all robot status information is sent to user, then complete monitoring is achieved, but irrelevant information increases data transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiddata transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system adapts information transmission based on user location and context. When the user is remotely located, only critical status information and task progress are transmitted. When the user is nearby, more detailed information is provided. This selective information transmission reduces unnecessary data traffic while ensuring users receive relevant updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of information

If robot sends all task-related messages, then user is fully informed, but user distraction increases when not in proximity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser awarenessVSAvoiduser attention management
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The message transmission system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on detected user proximity. Sensors detect whether the user is near the robot or remotely located. When remotely located, the robot sends automated status updates and task progress reports. When the user is nearby, message transmission is reduced or paused, allowing the user to directly observe the robot's operations without distraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11789447B2Remote control of an autonomous mobile robot
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO KG
  • US11789447B2 patent drawing
  • US11789447B2 patent drawing
  • US11789447B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system comprising at least one autonomous mobile robot (service robot) and at least one mobile terminal for controlling the robot. According to one embodiment of the disclosure, the robot and the mobile terminal are designed to communicate via at least a first wireless connection. The robot is designed to detect information regarding the location of a user (e.g. on the basis of the location of the terminal) and to decide as a function of the detected information regarding the location whether and, if yes, which information is sent to the mobile terminal and/or whether and, if yes, which actions are carried out, interrupted, continued or terminated by the robot.