Autonomous Robot Route Mapping With Delta-Based Anomaly Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining safe and traversable routes for autonomous vehicles in urban environments are inefficient due to reliance on outdated GIS data, which requires frequent manual re-evaluation and installation of costly sensor systems, and struggle with distinguishing features in satellite imagery.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous delivery vehicle equipped with a sensor array including GPS, sonar, laser, video camera, and other sensors to manually or semi-manually map and re-map safe routes, using delta values to detect changes and trigger alerts or contingency plans, with human intervention when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If GIS data is used for route determination, then navigation capability is provided, but the data becomes outdated and requires frequent manual re-evaluation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute data currencyVSAvoidmanual re-evaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle performs self-mapping and self-updating of route data using its own sensors and GPS, eliminating the need for manual re-evaluation of GIS data. The vehicle continuously collects and stores environmental data, automatically keeping route information current without human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static GIS data to dynamic, real-time environmental data collected by vehicle sensors. This changes the parameter of data freshness from outdated to current, and enables automatic updates without manual re-evaluation cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If sensor systems are installed along safe routes to locate and track features, then detection accuracy is improved, but the system becomes expensive and unsightly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle's sensor array serves multiple functions: it maps the environment, locates the vehicle, tracks features, and determines safe routes. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for dedicated sensor systems installed along routes, reducing overall system complexity and cost while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicle acts as a mobile intermediary that collects and processes environmental data, replacing the need for fixed sensor infrastructure. The vehicle's sensors and processing capabilities mediate between the environment and the navigation system, providing accurate feature detection without permanent installations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of stationary object

If satellite imagery is used to identify features, then broad area coverage is achieved, but it is difficult to distinguish features automatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping coverage areaVSAvoidfeature distinction difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces satellite-based optical imaging with active sensing technologies including GPS for positioning, sonar for depth and obstacle detection, and laser rangefinders for precise distance measurement. These technologies provide unambiguous data about environmental features without relying on visual interpretation of satellite imagery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The mapping process is segmented into multiple specialized sensing functions: GPS for location, sonar for underwater or obscured features, laser for precise ranging, and video for visual confirmation. Each sensor type addresses specific detection challenges, making feature identification easier than with single broad-coverage satellite imagery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient, real-time mapping and re-mapping of safe routes, reducing reliance on outdated data and minimizing human intervention costs, while ensuring safe navigation through dynamic urban conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The sensor array includes a GPS, sonar, laser, video camera, and other sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGPS (Global Positioning System):

Implementation Method 2

The sensor array includes a GPS, sonar, laser, video camera, and other sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSonar: Sonar

Implementation Method 3

The sensor array includes a GPS, sonar, laser, video camera, and other sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS11624631B2Autonomous robots and methods for determining, mapping, and traversing routes for autonomous robots
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 DAXBOT INC
  • US11624631B2 patent drawing
  • US11624631B2 patent drawing
  • US11624631B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for mapping safe and traversable routes for robot vehicles comprise using a deviation to create an operating range threshold that is to be included in a stored path and used by a robot vehicle as a threshold for normal operating conditions when the robot vehicle traverses a safe and traversable route. Methods for responding to unsafe conditions detected by a robot vehicle during operations comprise executing a contingency plan when a variance exceeds an operating delta and does not exceed an intervention delta. Methods for responding to anomalous conditions encountered by a robot vehicle comprise contacting a human controller when a variance exceeds an operating delta and an intervention delta.