Conveyance Robot Selection Based on Load Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In conveyance systems with multiple robots, there is a need to select the most appropriate robot based on the stability of the conveyed object to ensure efficient delivery, as existing systems lack a method to dynamically assess and respond to the stability of objects being transported.

Innovation Solution

A conveyance system comprising multiple robots, a robot information storage unit, a stability information acquisition unit, and a selection unit that acquires and compares stability information to select the most suitable robot for conveying objects, using user input, image data comparison, or robot feature information to determine the best robot for the task.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple conveyance robots are deployed in the system, then the productivity and versatility of the conveyance system are improved, but the complexity of selecting the appropriate robot for each conveyed object increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconveyance efficiencyVSAvoidrobot selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by acquiring stability information about the conveyed object and using it to select the appropriate conveyance robot. The stability information acquisition unit collects data about the object's stability, and the selection unit uses this feedback to determine which robot is best suited for the task, ensuring optimal matching between robot capabilities and object characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its robot selection based on the stability characteristics of the conveyed object. Rather than using a fixed assignment rule, the system adjusts its decision-making process in real-time by evaluating the stability information and selecting the most appropriate robot from the plurality of available robots, making the system flexible and adaptive to different conveying scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the system acquires stability information through user input, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability may be reduced due to potential user error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability information inputVSAvoidstability information accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by providing a user interface that mediates between the user and the robot selection process. The user inputs stability information through the interface, which then serves as an intermediary data source for the selection unit to process and translate into appropriate robot selection, making the system both user-friendly and systematically rigorous.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the system uses image data comparison to acquire stability information, then the measurement precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability assessment accuracyVSAvoidimage processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual or mechanical stability assessment methods with optical and computational approaches. By using image data captured by imaging devices and comparing it against reference image data, the system substitutes physical stability measurement with visual analysis and image processing algorithms, achieving higher precision while reducing the need for complex mechanical sensing equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the selection unit considers multiple robot features including raising/lowering mechanism capabilities, then the adaptability of the system is improved, but the complexity of the selection process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot selection adaptabilityVSAvoidselection criteria complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The selection process is segmented into distinct evaluation dimensions, with the selection unit considering multiple independent features such as raising/lowering mechanism capabilities, speed characteristics, and stability performance. By dividing the selection criteria into separable segments, the system can systematically evaluate each feature independently and integrate the results to make a comprehensive robot selection decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11815883B2Conveyance system, conveyance method, and program
Publication Date: 2023.11.14 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11815883B2 patent drawing
  • US11815883B2 patent drawing
  • US11815883B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A conveyance system includes a plurality of conveyance robots, a storage unit, a stability information acquisition unit, a selection unit, and a system controller, which serves as a controller. The plurality of conveyance robots convey a wagon that accommodates a conveyed object. The storage unit stores robot information regarding features that the plurality of respective conveyance robots include. The stability information acquisition unit acquires stability information regarding stability when the conveyed object is conveyed. The selection unit selects one of the plurality of conveyance robots based on the robot information and the stability information that have been acquired. The system controller instructs the one conveyance robot that has been selected to convey the conveyed object.