Autonomous Robot Speed Control Across Camera and Wireless Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous movement systems for facilities do not effectively manage vehicle speeds based on control states, limiting flexibility and efficiency in navigation.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous movement system that adjusts speed based on cooperation, connection, and caution modes, utilizing facility cameras and access points for position information and wireless communication to determine optimal movement speeds and routes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the autonomous movement device moves at a constant high speed, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates because the device cannot adapt to different control states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement speedVSAvoidcontrol state adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous movement device dynamically adjusts its movement speed based on the current control state (cooperation mode, connection mode, or caution mode). The control unit changes the movement speed from a first speed in cooperation mode to a second speed in connection mode, and to a third speed in caution mode, making the system adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the movement speed parameter according to different control states. By defining multiple speed levels (first speed, second speed, third speed) corresponding to different operational modes, the system optimizes productivity while maintaining reliability through parameter adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the autonomous movement device uses multiple control modes with different speeds, then reliability is improved through better control state management, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol state managementVSAvoidspeed control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors the control state (determining whether the device is in cooperation mode, connection mode, or caution mode) and provides feedback to adjust the movement speed accordingly. This closed-loop control improves reliability by ensuring the device responds appropriately to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control space is segmented into three distinct modes (cooperation mode, connection mode, caution mode), each with its own speed parameter. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by dividing the control problem into discrete, manageable states rather than handling continuous variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the autonomous movement device prioritizes fast movement, then productivity is improved, but position accuracy deteriorates due to reduced control precision at higher speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement efficiencyVSAvoidposition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The movement speed is dynamically adjusted based on the control state and position accuracy requirements. In caution mode where position accuracy is critical, the device moves at a reduced third speed. In cooperation mode where efficiency is prioritized, the device moves at a higher first speed, achieving a dynamic balance between productivity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances control mode flexibility, shortens movement time, and reduces position deviation by dynamically adjusting speeds and route planning according to the control state of the autonomous movement system.

Implementation Method 1

a facility camera 400 that photographs a first range 410 in the facility 900 to generate image data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotography: Photography

Implementation Method 2

an access point 500 that is connected with the mobile robot 100 inside a second range 510 in the facility 900 by wireless communication

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWireless communication:

Data Source

PatentUS12038755B2Autonomous movement system, autonomous movement method, and autonomous movement program
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12038755B2 patent drawing
  • US12038755B2 patent drawing
  • US12038755B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous movement system according to an embodiment is an autonomous movement system for autonomous movement in a facility, the autonomous movement system changing a movement speed for the autonomous movement depending on a cooperation mode, a connection mode and a caution mode, the cooperation mode being a mode of moving while acquiring position information inside a first range in cooperation with a facility camera, the first range being a range that the facility camera photographs to generate image data, the facility camera being fixed in the facility, the connection mode being a mode of moving inside a second range and outside the first range, the second range being a range in which connection with an access point is performed by wireless communication, the access point being fixed in the facility, the caution mode being a mode of moving outside the first range and outside the second range.