Robot Staging Station Allocation for Fleet Readiness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need to efficiently manage a fleet of robots in industrial facilities to ensure that capable robots are available when needed, while minimizing resource expenditure and disruption. Existing methods often result in underutilized charging stations, excessive resource allocation, and inefficient organization of robot positions, leading to increased storage requirements and clogged pathways.

Innovation Solution

A robotics management system integrated with a robotics staging system that dynamically manages the fleet of mobile robots. This system determines the necessary resources for facility operations, optimizes robot charging and maintenance, and efficiently allocates robot positions based on expected demand and availability, using techniques such as asset monitoring and predictive maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a one-to-one correspondence of charging stations and robots is implemented, then each robot can be kept sufficiently charged, but many charging stations remain unused much of the time, draining resources unnecessarily and wasting space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot battery charge availabilityVSAvoidresource waste from unused charging stations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Charging stations are designed to serve multiple robots rather than being dedicated to a single robot. The system allows any available robot to use any charging station, transforming fixed one-to-one assignments into flexible many-to-many relationships that maximize resource utilization while ensuring charge availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If resources are expended to maintain an entire fleet of robots at the highest level of capability, then all robots are always ready for any task, but resources are wasted without consideration for the level of capability suited for the tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot capability for any taskVSAvoidexcessive resource expenditure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly maintaining all robots at maximum capability, the system assigns different capability levels to different robots based on their specific task requirements. Each robot is maintained at the appropriate local quality level needed for its designated functions, reducing overall resource expenditure while preserving necessary adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts robot capability allocation based on current task demands and robot availability. Capability levels are not fixed but adapt to changing operational requirements, allowing the fleet to maintain versatility when needed while conserving resources during periods of lower demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If robots are inefficiently organized in the facility, then storage requirements increase and robot pathways become clogged, but efficient organization requires complex management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot pathway efficiencyVSAvoidorganization management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-positions robots in staging areas near their expected deployment locations before tasks are assigned. This preliminary organization reduces travel distances and prevents pathway congestion, while the automated management system handles the complexity of coordinating these positions without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If robots are moved out of the way of other robots, then pathways remain clear for production missions, but robots may be moved from optimal positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepathway clearance for missionsVSAvoidrobot relocation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A centralized management system acts as an intermediary to coordinate robot movements. When pathway clearance is needed, the system intelligently selects which robots to move and to where, minimizing disruption to optimal positioning. The intermediary coordinates timing and destinations to reduce total relocation time while ensuring pathways remain clear for production missions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12282312B2Robot staging area management
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 YOKOGAWA ELECTRIC CORP
  • US12282312B2 patent drawing
  • US12282312B2 patent drawing
  • US12282312B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations are described herein for managing mobile robots in a robot staging area. In various implementations, a state of a mobile robot transitioning from a production mode to a staging mode may be determined. A state of a plurality of robot staging stations may also be determined. The plurality of robot staging stations may include at least one each of a charging station and a maintenance station. Based at least in part on the determined states of the mobile robot and plurality of robot staging stations, a robot staging station may be selected from the plurality of robot staging stations. The mobile robot may be assigned a staging mission, which may cause the mobile robot to travel to the selected robot staging station.