Robot Emergency Stop Circuit With Duplex Safety Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robots lack an effective mechanism for emergency stopping, which is crucial for ensuring user safety during interactions, especially in dynamic and unpredictable environments.

Innovation Solution

A robot system incorporating a stop circuit and controller that generates control signals for emergency stopping based on sensor data and user input, utilizing a duplexing processor to ensure reliable operation and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a robot operates autonomously in dynamic environments, then productivity and automation are improved, but safety and reliability deteriorate due to lack of emergency stopping capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operation capabilityVSAvoidsafety in emergency situations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple independent components: a main processor for normal operations and a separate duplexing processor specifically dedicated to safety monitoring and emergency stopping functions. This segmentation allows the robot to maintain autonomous productivity while ensuring independent safety verification through the duplexing processor that continuously monitors system states and can trigger emergency stops without interfering with normal autonomous operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If emergency stopping mechanisms are added to robots, then safety and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency stopping capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The emergency stopping functionality is merged into the existing dual-processor architecture by designating one processor as a duplexing processor. Rather than adding separate emergency stop hardware, the system combines safety functions with the control system's processor structure. The duplexing processor shares the physical platform with the main processor but operates independently to monitor safety conditions, triggering emergency stops when necessary without requiring additional complex safety subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If multiple processors are used for safety monitoring, then reliability is improved, but use of energy and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring accuracyVSAvoidprocessor power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The duplexing processor performs multiple functions: it monitors safety conditions, verifies main processor operations, and can trigger emergency stops. By making this processor multi-functional, the system achieves reliable safety monitoring without adding dedicated single-purpose safety hardware. The same processor that could handle control tasks can also perform safety monitoring, reducing overall energy consumption compared to having separate specialized safety processors while maintaining the benefits of dual-processor safety verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11524413B2Emergency stop of robot
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US11524413B2 patent drawing
  • US11524413B2 patent drawing
  • US11524413B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot may perform emergency stopping. The robot includes: a driving device configured to perform movement of the robot; a stop switch configured to output a stop switch signal; a controller configured to output a stop signal; and a stop circuit configured to output a first control signal and a second control signal for stopping the driving device. The stop circuit may output the first control signal and the second control signal in response to the stop signal and the stop switch signal.