Robot Surface Proximity Detection Using Piezoelectric Acoustic Waves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collision avoidance systems for robotic manipulators face challenges in accurately detecting obstacles at short ranges, especially in cluttered environments, due to limitations of camera-based methods and directional sensors, which are costly and have blind spots, complicating robotic system design and increasing costs.

Innovation Solution

A proximity detection system using piezoelectric elements to generate and receive acoustic waves, filtered through band-pass and linear time-invariant filters, and analyzed by a neural network to detect obstacles, providing full surface and omnidirectional detection without dead spots.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If camera-based object recognition or 3D shape reconstruction is used for collision avoidance, then obstacle detection capability is improved, but performance suffers in poor light conditions, with occlusions, and at very short ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection reliability in poor conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces camera-based optical detection with acoustic wave-based detection using piezoelectric elements. This substitution enables reliable obstacle detection at very short ranges (including less than 10 cm) and in conditions where cameras fail, such as poor lighting, occlusions, and with transparent or mirrored objects. The acoustic waves propagate along the robot surface and are reflected by obstacles, providing detection capability independent of visual conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Length of stationary object

If LiDAR or millimeter wave radar is used for short-range detection, then detection range is improved, but cost increases and device complexity increases due to need for multiple sensors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the robot surface itself multi-functional by integrating piezoelectric elements that both generate and detect acoustic waves directly on the surface. This eliminates the need for separate directional sensors like LiDAR or radar, as the entire surface becomes an omnidirectional detection system. A single integrated system provides full-surface coverage without blind spots, reducing both cost and complexity while maintaining effective short-range detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Area of stationary object

If multiple directional sensors are distributed throughout the robot to eliminate blind spots, then detection coverage is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverage areaVSAvoidsensor distribution complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from discrete point-based directional sensors to a continuous surface-based detection system. By propagating acoustic waves along the robot surface and detecting reflections at multiple points, the system achieves omnidirectional coverage across the entire surface area. This dimensional approach—moving from 0D point sensors to 2D surface integration—provides complete coverage without requiring multiple separate sensor components or complex spatial distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves reliable, low-cost, and efficient proximity detection across the entire robot surface with minimal modifications, ensuring high true positive rates and zero false positives for obstacle detection.

Implementation Method 1

a first one among a plurality of piezoelectric elements disposed adjacent to a surface of an object generates an acoustic wave along the surface of the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

a second one among the piezoelectric elements receives an acoustic wave signal corresponding to the generated acoustic wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Converse Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20250312932A1Method and apparatus for robot collision avoidance by full surface proximity detection
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20250312932A1 patent drawing
  • US20250312932A1 patent drawing
  • US20250312932A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for collision avoidance by surface proximity detection includes a plurality of piezoelectric elements disposed adjacent to a surface of an object, a memory storing instructions, and at least one processor configured to execute the instructions to control a first one among the piezoelectric elements to generate an acoustic wave along the surface of the object, and receive, via a second one among the piezoelectric elements, an acoustic wave signal corresponding to the generated acoustic wave. The at least one processor is further configured to execute the instructions to filter the received acoustic wave signal, using a band-pass filter for reducing noise of the received acoustic wave signal, obtain a proximity signal for proximity detection, from the filtered acoustic wave signal, using a linear time-invariant filter, and detect whether an obstacle is proximate to the surface of the object by inputting the obtained proximity signal into a neural network.