Robot Task Planning From Complex Instructions and Visual Cues

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robots struggle to interpret complex human language instructions for tasks that require multiple discrete actions, as human language is ambiguous and context-dependent, leading to difficulties in determining the appropriate sequence of actions needed to achieve a long-term goal.

Innovation Solution

A system that combines symbolic task planning with natural language understanding and visual inputs to generate a sequence of discrete tasks for robotic manipulation, using neural networks to analyze audio and image data to infer predicates and plan optimal task sequences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If robots use conventional approaches to interpret human language instructions, then the system complexity remains low, but the robot cannot accurately interpret complex or ambiguous instructions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction interpretation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task interpretation problem into distinct components: visual scene understanding, audio instruction processing, predicate inference, and task sequence planning. Each component is handled by specialized modules that process specific aspects of the input independently before integrating results, thereby improving accuracy without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediate representations including visual scene graphs from image data, audio transcriptions from speech, and inferred predicates that bridge the gap between raw sensory inputs and task planning. These intermediaries structure the information in a form that is easier to process and reason about, enhancing interpretation accuracy while managing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If robots require explicit step-by-step instructions for each action, then the instructions are unambiguous, but this lacks adaptability to natural human communication styles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenatural language understandingVSAvoidtask specification completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the visual scene and audio instructions to infer missing task details before generating the final task sequence. By pre-processing the inputs to extract predicates, objects, and relationships, the system recovers incomplete information from natural language instructions without requiring explicit step-by-step specification from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses visual feedback from the scene understanding module to disambiguate referents in audio instructions (e.g., determining which drawer or knife is being referenced). The visual scene provides contextual feedback that resolves ambiguities in natural language, enabling the system to adapt to human communication styles while recovering complete task specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If robots infer which specific objects and actions are needed from complex tasks, then the robot can handle natural language instructions, but the computational difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction input simplicityVSAvoidtask inference difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the inference process into distinct stages: visual object detection and scene graph construction, audio transcription and entity recognition, predicate inference from combined inputs, and task sequence generation. This segmentation reduces the computational difficulty of each individual inference step compared to attempting to solve the entire problem in one complex process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces visual scene graphs and audio transcriptions as intermediary representations that structure the raw sensory data before task inference. These intermediaries make the inference process more manageable by organizing information in standardized formats that facilitate automated reasoning about which objects and actions are needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12487581B2Interpreting discrete tasks from complex instructions for robotic systems and applications
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 NVIDIA CORP
  • US12487581B2 patent drawing
  • US12487581B2 patent drawing
  • US12487581B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Approaches provide for performance of a complex (e.g., compound) task that may involve multiple discrete tasks not obvious from an instruction to perform the complex task. A set of conditions for an environment can be determined using captured image data, and the instruction analyzed to determine a set of final conditions to exist in the environment after performance of the instruction. These initial and end conditions are used to determine a sequence of discrete tasks to be performed to cause a robot or automated device to perform the instruction. This can involve use of a symbolic or visual planner in at least some embodiments, as well as a search of possible sequences of actions available for the robot or automated device. A robot can be caused to perform the sequence of discrete tasks, and feedback provided such that the sequence of tasks can be modified as appropriate.