Robot Task Timing Control Based on User Proximity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional robot control systems fail to efficiently manage task execution times when users arrive late at designated service locations, leading to canceled services and increased resource consumption, as they typically require rescheduling and re-attempting tasks.

Innovation Solution

A robot control method and system that adjusts task performance times based on the user's location, allowing the robot to wait for the user if they are nearby, thereby extending the scheduled time and ensuring task completion without rescheduling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the robot strictly follows the scheduled task performance time, then the task execution efficiency is improved, but the user service satisfaction deteriorates when users arrive late

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution efficiencyVSAvoiduser service satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The robot control system dynamically adjusts the task performance time based on real-time user location data. When a user is detected near the service location, the system extends the task performance time automatically, transforming the rigid scheduled time into a flexible parameter that adapts to user arrival conditions, thereby resolving the contradiction between execution efficiency and service satisfaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism by continuously monitoring user location through camera or positioning systems and using this information to adjust task performance timing. The location information feeds back to the control system, which then modifies the task execution schedule accordingly, creating a closed-loop control that balances efficiency and user satisfaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the robot waits for the user beyond the scheduled time, then the user service satisfaction is improved, but the resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser service satisfactionVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the time parameter dynamically based on user proximity. Instead of using a fixed waiting time, the task performance time is adjusted as a variable parameter that depends on real-time user location, allowing the robot to wait only as long as necessary, thus improving service satisfaction without excessive resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The waiting time is transformed from a static value to a dynamic parameter that adjusts based on user location. The robot monitors user proximity and extends the task performance time only when needed, creating an adaptive waiting mechanism that optimizes the balance between service quality and resource efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the robot uses location-based task time adjustment, then the user service flexibility is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser service flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions into a unified task management module: task allocation, user location monitoring, distance calculation, and dynamic time adjustment all work together in one system. This multi-functional integration achieves high service flexibility while managing complexity through consolidated control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the task scheduling function with the user monitoring function into a single integrated control process. By combining these previously separate functions, the system achieves flexible user service through a unified mechanism rather than multiple independent systems, thereby managing complexity while improving adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11850759B2Control method and system for robot
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 NAVER CORP
  • US11850759B2 patent drawing
  • US11850759B2 patent drawing
  • US11850759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control method and system for a robot. The robot control method includes allocating a task to a robot, the task associated with a place and a target user, determining a location of the target user based on an image received from a camera, the camera being arranged in a space including the place, and controlling a performance time of the task based on the location of the target user and the place.