Robot Teaching Point Grouping for Faster Parameter Setting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of setting speeds and other operation values for numerous teaching points in robot operation programs makes the teaching process cumbersome and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves acquiring and displaying multiple teaching points, classifying them into groups, receiving operation parameters, and setting operation values for each group using those parameters, simplifying the process by reducing the number of parameters to be set.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If operation values are set for each individual teaching point, then the precision of robot operation control is improved, but the complexity of teaching work increases and time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation control precisionVSAvoidteaching work complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple teaching points into teaching point groups, where operation values are set at the group level rather than individually for each teaching point. This combining approach maintains operational precision while significantly reducing teaching work complexity and time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dual-level operation value setting system that works both at the teaching point group level (for efficiency) and the individual teaching point level (for precision when needed). This universal approach allows the system to adapt to different teaching scenarios, providing both simplified batch setting and detailed individual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If operation values are set for each individual teaching point, then the precision of robot operation control is improved, but the time required for teaching work increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation control precisionVSAvoidteaching work time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple teaching points into teaching point groups, where operation values are set at the group level rather than individually for each teaching point. This combining approach maintains operational precision while significantly reducing teaching work complexity and time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary classification of teaching points into groups before detailed operation value setting. This preliminary organization allows operators to efficiently set operation values for multiple teaching points simultaneously at the group level, reducing overall teaching time while maintaining the ability to adjust individual points if needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If teaching points are classified into groups, then the ease of operation is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveteaching operation easeVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments teaching points into distinct teaching point groups based on their operational characteristics and spatial relationships. This segmentation simplifies the teaching operation by allowing operators to work with grouped points rather than individual points, while the classification logic remains integrated within the control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automatic classification functionality that allows the system to self-organize teaching points into appropriate groups based on predefined criteria. This self-service classification reduces the manual effort required for grouping while maintaining ease of operation, as the system automatically performs the classification task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11839971B2Teaching control method for robot, robot system, and computer program
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US11839971B2 patent drawing
  • US11839971B2 patent drawing
  • US11839971B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A teaching control method includes displaying three or more plurality of teaching points on a display section, acquiring a result of classification processing for classifying the plurality of teaching points into one or more teaching point groups, receiving an operation parameter for each teaching point group, and setting an operation value for each teaching point group using the operation parameter.