Autonomous Robot Teleoperation Scheduling for Stuck Tasks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous robots often encounter situations where they lack the necessary strategies to complete tasks and become 'stuck', requiring human intervention but lack efficient methods for seamless teleoperation.

Innovation Solution

The robot is equipped with on-demand teleoperation capabilities, allowing it to prompt a human operator for assistance when it reaches a state where it cannot determine a strategy to proceed, using sensors and intuitive manual input devices for efficient human control, and resumes autonomous operation when conditions allow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the robot operates autonomously without teleoperation capabilities, then operational efficiency is improved, but the robot becomes stuck when lacking necessary strategies to complete tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidability to handle unfamiliar tasks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between autonomous and teleoperated modes based on the robot's confidence level in performing tasks. When the robot encounters unfamiliar situations or low-confidence scenarios, it transitions to teleoperation mode, allowing flexible adaptation while maintaining autonomous efficiency for routine tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the robot transitions to teleoperation when stuck, then task completion capability is improved, but operational interruptions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion capabilityVSAvoidoperational interruptions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of task confidence before execution. By evaluating whether it has sufficient strategies and confidence to complete a task beforehand, the robot can proactively determine when teleoperation is needed, avoiding unnecessary autonomous attempts that would lead to interruptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the robot uses traditional teleoperation methods, then human control is achieved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to complex control interfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman control interface usabilityVSAvoidteleoperation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The teleoperation system leverages the robot's own situational awareness and confidence assessment to determine when human assistance is needed. The robot autonomously identifies its knowledge gaps and initiates teleoperation requests, reducing the burden on operators to monitor and intervene in complex situations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12455568B2Autonomous robot with on demand teleoperation
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 DEXTERITY INC
  • US12455568B2 patent drawing
  • US12455568B2 patent drawing
  • US12455568B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot is operated in an autonomous mode of operation to perform a plurality of tasks. It is determined that a later task of the plurality of tasks needs human assistance while performing a current task of the plurality of tasks. The human assistance is scheduled for the later task. A teleoperator is communicated with to perform the human assistance associated with the later task.