Robot Visual Tracking Mode Switching for Real-Time Localization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Point feature-based SLAM algorithms in visual-inertial odometry consume high computational load, reducing the real-time performance of robot localization and navigation.

Innovation Solution

A visual tracking method for robots using a window-based and projection-based matching mode alternation, where the robot switches between these modes based on tracking success or failure, and incorporates inertial data for adaptive image tracking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If point feature-based SLAM algorithm is used, then feature tracking and image composition can be completed, but computational load increases and real-time performance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature tracking accuracyVSAvoidreal-time performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the tracking process into two distinct modes: projection-based matching mode for initial tracking and window-based matching mode for refined tracking. This segmentation allows the system to use the computationally lighter projection-based method first, then switch to the more accurate but heavier window-based method only when necessary, thus reducing overall computational load while maintaining tracking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic switching between two tracking modes based on tracking success or failure. The system adapts its processing strategy in real-time: using projection-based matching when tracking succeeds (lower computational load) and window-based matching when tracking fails (higher accuracy). This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by adjusting the balance between speed and accuracy according to actual tracking conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If window-based matching mode is used continuously, then tracking accuracy is maintained, but computational load and tracking time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking accuracyVSAvoidtracking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using the computationally intensive window-based matching mode only partially - specifically, only when the projection-based matching mode fails. In normal successful tracking scenarios, the system uses the lighter projection-based method, thus avoiding unnecessary computational expenditure and reducing overall tracking time while maintaining accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The projection-based matching mode serves as an intermediary that handles the majority of tracking cases with lower computational cost. When this intermediary method succeeds, the system avoids the heavier window-based matching. Only when the intermediary fails does the system resort to the full window-based matching, thus reducing tracking time while preserving accuracy through the intermediary's filtering effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If projection-based matching mode is used, then computational load is reduced, but tracking reliability decreases when tracking fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidtracking success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a cushioning mechanism by having the window-based matching mode ready as a backup when projection-based matching fails. This prior preparation of an alternative method ensures that tracking reliability is maintained - when the primary projection-based method encounters failure, the system can immediately switch to the more robust window-based method, cushioning against complete tracking failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the projection-based matching results to control switching to window-based matching. When projection-based matching fails (feedback signal), the system activates window-based matching to recover tracking. This feedback mechanism ensures that computational efficiency is maintained during successful tracking while reliability is preserved by activating the more robust method only when needed, based on actual tracking performance feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260027725A1Visual tracking method of robot
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 AMICRO SEMICONDUCTOR CO LTD
  • US20260027725A1 patent drawing
  • US20260027725A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a visual tracking method of robot, wherein an execution body of the visual tracking method of the robot is a robot fixedly equipped with a camera and an inertial sensor; the visual tracking method of the robot includes: the robot performing image tracking using a window-based matching mode, and when the robot succeeds in performing tracking using the window-based matching mode, the robot stopping performing image tracking using the window-based matching mode, and then the robot performing image tracking using a projection-based matching model; and then, when the robot fails to perform tracking using the projection-based matching mode, the robot stopping performing image tracking using the projection-based matching mode, and then the robot performing image tracking using the window-based matching mode.