Autonomous Robot Control for Value-Aware Object Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic systems lack the ability to plan actions based on the varying values of peripheral objects, leading to potential damage or improper handling of valuable items.

Innovation Solution

A control device equipped with a value estimation unit to assess the value of objects using sensor data and an action planning unit to plan movements, routes, postures, and handling methods accordingly, ensuring careful handling of valuable objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the robot plans actions without considering object values, then the control system is simple and fast, but valuable objects may be damaged or improperly handled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The value estimation unit performs preliminary assessment of object values before the action planning unit generates movement routes or handling actions. This preliminary valuation enables the control system to prioritize safety measures for high-value objects, resolving the contradiction by preparing safety information in advance rather than adding complex real-time decision-making structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The value estimation unit acts as an intermediary component between sensor data and action planning. It transforms raw sensor data into meaningful object value assessments that guide the action planning unit, enabling reliable object protection without requiring the entire control system to become fundamentally more complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the robot maintains distance from all objects, then object damage risk is reduced, but the robot's mobility and task completion efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject protectionVSAvoidrobot mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The action planning unit applies different safety margins and protection levels to different objects based on their estimated values. High-value objects receive larger safety buffers and more cautious handling, while low-value objects allow closer approach and more aggressive manipulation. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by providing object-specific protection rather than uniform distance maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts movement parameters such as speed, acceleration, and positioning precision based on the value of nearby objects. When approaching high-value objects, the system reduces speed and increases positioning accuracy; for low-value objects, normal operating parameters are maintained. This parameter adaptation enables both protection and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the robot uses complex sensor data processing to accurately estimate object values, then handling accuracy improves, but computation time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalue estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The value estimation unit employs a hierarchical processing approach where basic object detection and coarse valuation occur quickly using simplified sensor data, while more precise valuation is performed only when needed for high-value objects or critical decisions. This partial application of complex processing resolves the contradiction by avoiding full computation in all scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the robot's own sensor data and pre-stored object information to autonomously estimate values without requiring external verification or complex multi-source data fusion in real-time. This self-service approach enables accurate enough valuation for practical purposes while minimizing computation time and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12038750B2Control device and control method for a movable body
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US12038750B2 patent drawing
  • US12038750B2 patent drawing
  • US12038750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present technology relates to a control device, a control method, and a program that enable the action of a movable body to be planned in accordance with the value of a peripheral object. The control device according to an embodiment of the present technology estimates a value of an object at the periphery of a movable body on the basis of sensor data detected by the movable body, and plans an action of the movable body on the basis of the value of the object estimated. The present technology is applicable to robots capable of acting autonomously.