Robot Vision Label Propagation for Environment-Specific Model Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for training and evaluating machine learning models for object detection in robotics are time-consuming and resource-intensive, often requiring human labeling of thousands of images, and average performance measurements across different environments are inadequate predictors of performance in specific environments, hindering the automation of tasks in distribution centers.

Innovation Solution

Leveraging spatial information to facilitate labeling vision data by propagating labels throughout a log based on expected object locations, reducing the need for extensive human labeling and enabling efficient training and evaluation of machine learning models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods are used for training machine learning models, then model accuracy can be achieved through extensive human labeling, but the process becomes time-consuming and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service labeling where the machine learning model automatically labels its own predictions without requiring human annotators. The model uses spatial information and environmental context to generate labels for training data, eliminating the time-consuming human labeling process while maintaining training accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing environmental data and spatial information before model training. By preparing labeled data in advance using automated methods and spatial reasoning, the system reduces the overall training time and resource requirements while maintaining model performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If human workers are used for labeling vision data, then accurate labels can be obtained, but the cost and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabel accuracyVSAvoidlabeling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces human workers with automated self-service labeling mechanisms. The machine learning model generates its own labels by processing spatial information and environmental data, achieving both high label accuracy and improved productivity by eliminating human labor constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system substitutes the mechanical process of human annotation with automated computational methods. By using algorithms to process spatial data and generate labels automatically, the system maintains labeling accuracy while dramatically improving efficiency and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If average performance measurements are used across different environments, then model performance can be evaluated generally, but performance in specific environments cannot be predicted accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneral performanceVSAvoidenvironment-specific performance prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by evaluating model performance specifically for each environment rather than using average metrics across all environments. By analyzing spatial information and environmental characteristics unique to each location, the system provides precise predictions for environment-specific performance while maintaining general adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12482243B1Leveraging environmental information to facilitate training and evaluating machine learning models and related technology
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 AGILITY ROBOTICS INC
  • US12482243B1 patent drawing
  • US12482243B1 patent drawing
  • US12482243B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present technology includes providing an image and a plurality of indicators. The image depicts an environment of a robot and corresponds to vision data collected by a vision sensor of the robot at a given timestep of a plurality of timesteps. Indicators among the plurality of indicators correspond to respective expected object locations within the environment. The method further includes receiving user input indicating a user identified state of the given one of the expected object locations based at least partially on the image. Finally, the method includes associating additional vision data with the user identified state of the given one of the expected object locations at least partially in response to receiving the user input. The additional vision data is collected by the vision sensor at additional timesteps of the plurality of timesteps.