Robot Resistance Welding Rotation Control for Variable Weld Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robot-assisted resistance welding processes face inefficiencies due to predefined rotational movement durations, leading to longer process times and potential welding without movement or unnecessarily long movements, especially when welding times are unknown due to varying materials.

Innovation Solution

A method where a robot arrangement performs a rotational movement during electric welding, with the start and end controlled by detected or commanded welding events, and the direction of rotation changed based on predefined parameters during contact, ensuring a sufficient and optimized rotational movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the duration of rotational movement is predefined in advance according to maximum welding time, then welding without rotational movement is avoided, but process times become longer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding qualityVSAvoidprocess time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors the actual welding time and adjusts the rotational movement duration based on detected welding parameters and material characteristics, rather than using a fixed maximum time. This feedback mechanism ensures the rotational movement lasts sufficiently for quality welding without unnecessarily extending the process time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static, predefined rotational movement duration to a dynamic duration that adapts to actual welding conditions. The rotational movement time is adjusted in real-time based on detected welding parameters, material type, and process conditions, optimizing both quality and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the rotational movement duration is predefined in advance, then the control is simplified, but the welding result may be compromised when welding time varies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidwelding result
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses feedback from welding parameters and material detection to automatically adjust the rotational movement duration, maintaining welding quality without requiring complex manual intervention. The system monitors welding conditions and adapts the rotation time accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of the rotational movement duration based on detected welding conditions and material characteristics. The control system automatically optimizes the process parameters without requiring external intervention, ensuring reliable welding results while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If a fixed predefined rotational movement is used, then the system is simpler to operate, but it cannot adapt to different materials and welding conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidmaterial adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the rotational movement parameters based on detected material type and welding conditions. The control system transitions from fixed parameters to adaptive parameters that automatically respond to different materials and process conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (rotational movement duration, speed, and characteristics) based on detected welding conditions and material properties. This parameter adaptation enables the system to handle various materials and welding scenarios while maintaining operational simplicity through automatic adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the welding result by ensuring a sufficiently long rotational movement while avoiding unnecessary extensions or interruptions, thus enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the welding process.

Implementation Method 1

a rotational movement is carried out for or during the electric welding of one or more, in particular at least two, workpiece(s) of a workpiece arrangement with the aid of a robot arrangement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational movement:

Implementation Method 2

the welding is resistance and/or spot welding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistance welding: Welding

Data Source

PatentUS11633801B2Resistance welding by means of robots
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 KUKA DEUT GMBH
  • US11633801B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for electric welding a workpiece arrangement having at least one workpiece with the aid of a robot arrangement including at least one robot. A rotational movement is carried out between the workpiece arrangement to be welded and at least one welding electrode which contacts the workpiece arrangement. The rotational movement is started as a function of a commanded and/or detected welding start and/or ended as a function of a commanded and/or detected welding end. The direction of rotation of the movement may be changed as a function of a predefined parameter during contact between the welding electrode and the workpiece arrangement.