Robotic Arm Central Channel Shape Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic arms with articulated links face challenges in measuring shape accurately, especially for small diameter arms with limited peripheral space, and require complex construction methods that complicate the integration of control and service cables.

Innovation Solution

An elongate robotic arm with a central channel and a flexible, resilient stiffening member that includes a sensor, such as an optical fibre, to measure the arm's shape, allowing for precise mechanical engagement of links and easier cable threading, with the stiffening member fixed at optimal points to ensure accurate shape measurement and prevent buckling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sensors are mounted around the periphery of links to measure arm shape, then shape measurement is possible, but the device complexity increases and peripheral space is consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearm shape measurementVSAvoidsensor mounting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor is integrated within the stiffening member itself, merging the shape measurement function with the structural stiffening element. This eliminates the need for separate peripheral sensors and reduces overall device complexity while maintaining measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The stiffening member serves multiple functions: providing torsional stiffness to the arm and housing the shape sensor. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed and simplifies the overall device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If control cables are threaded through the complete arm after construction, then cable routing is achieved, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable threading processVSAvoidconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control cables are threaded through the links during the assembly process itself, rather than after the arm is fully constructed. This preliminary action integrates cable routing with the assembly operation, reducing both manufacturing complexity and time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Volume of moving object

If the arm diameter is reduced for compactness, then the arm becomes more compact, but peripheral space for sensors and cables is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearm compactnessVSAvoidperipheral space
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor is placed within the stiffening member's internal structure rather than on the peripheral surface. This merging of functions allows the arm to maintain a compact diameter while still accommodating the sensor and other components within the internal volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Manufacturing precision

If links are engaged mechanically precisely, then assembly precision is improved, but the construction process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelink engagement precisionVSAvoidconstruction process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The links are designed to self-align and engage with each other through their geometric configuration and the stiffening member's structure. This self-service mechanism achieves precise engagement without requiring complex external alignment tools or procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies shape measurement, enhances torsional stiffness, and allows for precise construction and efficient cable management, improving the arm's bending and torsional stiffness while maintaining accurate shape detection.

Implementation Method 1

The sensor may be an elongate sensor member such as an optical fibre, a plurality of optical fibres, or a single fibre with multiple cores extruded within it. The fibre may have Bragg gratings etched within each core for different strain sensing.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical fibre sensing: Optical Fibre

Implementation Method 2

The fibre may have Bragg gratings etched within each core for different strain sensing.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBragg gratings strain sensing:

Implementation Method 3

The stiffening member is preferably flexible and resilient.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8758232B2Robotic arm
Publication Date: 2014.06.24 OLIVER CRISPIN ROBOTICS
  • US8758232B2 patent drawing
  • US8758232B2 patent drawing
  • US8758232B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An elongate robotic arm comprising articulated segments and a channel that extends along the longitudinal axis of the arm and contains a stiffening member which includes a sensor for measuring the shape of the arm. Using the central channel for this purpose improves the ease and accuracy of shape measurement.