Robotic Arm Linkage Sensing for Intuitive Manual Manipulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic medical systems require operators to manually transition robotic arms from position control mode to manual manipulation mode by reaching for a fixed input control, which is inconvenient and increases the risk of collisions and operator error during setup, and may lead to excessive contact forces during surgery.

Innovation Solution

A sensor architecture with distributed sensors on the robotic arm detects operator interactions and computes the intent to activate manual manipulation mode intuitively from various positions, automatically transitioning the arm to admittance or impedance mode in response to contact forces or preset thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed input control is used to activate manual manipulation mode, then the system can be controlled, but the operator convenience deteriorates and collision risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol reliabilityVSAvoidoperator convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm automatically detects operator intent through sensors and self-transitions to manual manipulation mode without requiring the operator to reach for a separate control. The system serves itself by monitoring its own state and environment, eliminating the need for the operator to perform the activation action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical button-pressing interaction with a sensor-based detection system. Sensors monitor operator proximity and arm position to computationally determine intent, substituting physical mechanical control with electronic sensing and automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If the operator moves around the operating room to reach the input control, then the control can be activated, but the risk of collision and tripping increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accessibilityVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors its own operational state and environment through sensors, automatically detecting when the operator intends to activate manual manipulation mode. This self-monitoring capability eliminates the need for the operator to leave their position and physically interact with remote controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors act as intermediaries between the operator and the robotic arm control system. Instead of direct physical interaction requiring operator movement, the sensors mediate the interaction by detecting operator presence and intent, translating this information into automated control mode transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the robotic arm remains in position control mode during surgery, then precise positioning is maintained, but excessive contact force may injure the patient or personnel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidexcessive contact force
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors continuously monitor the operational environment and provide feedback to the control system. When sensors detect conditions indicating potential excessive contact (such as operator presence near the arm or abnormal force conditions), the system receives feedback and automatically transitions to manual manipulation mode to prevent harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary protective action by automatically transitioning to manual manipulation mode before excessive contact force can occur. The sensor-based detection system identifies potential hazardous conditions in advance and preemptively changes the control mode to prevent injury to the patient or personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sensors are distributed throughout the robotic arm, then operator intent can be detected from various positions, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivation flexibilityVSAvoidsensor architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The distributed sensors serve multiple functions: they detect operator proximity, monitor arm position, determine operator intent, and potentially detect abnormal operational conditions. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by providing versatile capabilities from a single sensor architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple sensing functions into an integrated sensor architecture that operates as a unified system. Rather than separate systems for different functions, the sensors are merged into a cohesive network that collectively monitors the operational environment and determines control mode transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12502785B2System and method of activating manual manipulation using linkage interaction sensing
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 AURIS HEALTH INC
  • US12502785B2 patent drawing
  • US12502785B2 patent drawing
  • US12502785B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Robotic medical systems capable of manual manipulation are described. A robotic medical system can include a robotic arm and a sensor architecture. The sensor architecture can include one or more non-joint based sensors that are positioned to detect a first force exerted on the robotic arm. The robotic medical system can be configured to determine whether sensor data received from the sensor architecture meets first criteria. For example, the first criteria can be met in accordance with a determination that the first force exceeds a first threshold force. The robotic medical system can be configured to, in accordance with a determination that the first criteria are met, transition the robotic arm from a position control mode to a manual manipulation mode.