Robotic Arm Inertial Sensing for Pose Deflection Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical robots face inaccuracies in detecting deflections and pose errors due to limitations in encoder technology, leading to potential surgical inaccuracies.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating inertial sensors with a known physical relationship to the robotic arm, allowing for accurate measurement of movements and forces, and comparing these readings with encoder data to determine precise poses and generate alerts when thresholds are exceeded.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If encoder technology is used to detect robotic arm position, then the system is simple and cost-effective, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to detect deflections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepose detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines encoder technology with inertial sensors (accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers) to create a hybrid sensing system. The encoder provides baseline position information while the inertial sensors detect deflections and forces, merging both measurement methods to achieve high measurement precision without complete system replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The inertial sensors act as intermediary devices that detect forces and deflections that encoders cannot measure. These sensors provide intermediate measurement data that compensates for encoder limitations, particularly in detecting cantilever deflections and external forces applied to the robotic arm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional sensing methods are used, then device complexity remains low, but reliability deteriorates due to pose errors in surgical procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical procedure accuracyVSAvoidsensor integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors robotic arm position using both encoders and inertial sensors, comparing measurements in real-time. When discrepancies or threshold violations are detected (such as excessive forces or deflections), the system provides feedback alerts to operators, enabling corrective action to maintain surgical procedure accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The inertial sensors detect potential issues (forces, deflections, pose deviations) before they result in surgical errors. By monitoring these parameters continuously and providing advance warning through alerts, the system prevents reliability deterioration rather than reacting after problems occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If encoder-only systems are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision worsens due to undetected deflections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeflection detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The inertial sensors automatically detect and report deflections and forces without requiring manual intervention or complex operational procedures. The system self-monitors its own state, providing measurement precision improvement while maintaining ease of operation through automated sensing and alerting functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the accuracy of robotic arm positioning, reduces surgical inaccuracies, and provides real-time alerts for excessive forces or pose deviations, ensuring safer and more precise surgical procedures.

Implementation Method 1

at least one inertial sensor providing a measurement indicative of a movement of the tracked object from the first pose to a second pose

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

the at least one inertial sensor comprises a force sensor, and wherein the force sensor measures a force on the tracked object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce measurement: Force

Data Source

PatentUS12201377B2Arm movement safety layer
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 MAZOR ROBOTICS
  • US12201377B2 patent drawing
  • US12201377B2 patent drawing
  • US12201377B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system according to at least one embodiment of the present disclosure includes a processor; and at least one inertial sensor having a known physical relationship with a tracked object in a first pose, the at least one inertial sensor providing a measurement indicative of a movement of the tracked object from the first pose to a second pose, wherein the processor determines the second pose of the tracked object based, at least in part, on the measurement provided by the at least one inertial sensor.