Robotic Bone Cutting With Density-Adaptive Depth Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic systems struggle to efficiently remove material from non-homogeneous workpieces, such as bone, due to varying density distributions, which can lead to inaccurate cuts and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A surgical system comprising a robotic manipulator, a tool configured to remove material, a navigation system with trackers for the tool and workpiece, and controllers that determine the tool's pose relative to the workpiece, adjust cutting depths based on detected density, and control the manipulator to facilitate precise material removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a constant feed rate is used for non-homogeneous workpieces, then the system operation is simple, but cutting accuracy deteriorates due to varying material density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidcutting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of cutting parameters (feed rate, rotational speed, cutting depth) based on real-time detection of workpiece density variations. The controller continuously modifies these parameters during the cutting process to match the local material properties, transforming the static constant-parameter approach into a dynamic adaptive system that maintains cutting accuracy across heterogeneous materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes physical parameters (feed rate, rotational speed, cutting depth) in response to detected density variations. By monitoring material removal characteristics and adjusting cutting parameters accordingly, the system adapts to local material properties, ensuring consistent cutting accuracy throughout the non-homogeneous workpiece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a uniform tool path is applied to non-homogeneous workpieces, then the system operation is simple, but heat generation increases and cutting accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidheat generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adjusting cutting parameters according to local material density. Different regions of the workpiece receive customized cutting parameters - denser regions receive shallower cuts and lower feed rates to reduce heat generation, while less dense regions can tolerate higher parameters. This localized adaptation prevents excessive heat buildup in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting depth and feed rate are dynamically adjusted during the cutting process based on real-time density detection. The system transitions from a static uniform tool path to a dynamic adaptive path that modulates cutting intensity according to local material properties, thereby controlling heat generation in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If a constant rotational speed is used for non-homogeneous workpieces, then the system operation is simple, but cutting efficiency deteriorates and heat generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidcutting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotational speed is adjusted as a variable parameter based on detected material density. Denser materials receive lower rotational speeds to maintain cutting accuracy and control heat, while less dense materials receive higher speeds to maximize material removal efficiency. This parameter adaptation resolves the conflict between simplicity and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If cutting parameters are optimized for dense materials, then cutting accuracy is maintained, but procedure time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting accuracyVSAvoidprocedure time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different cutting parameters to different regions of the workpiece based on local density. Dense regions receive conservative parameters (lower feed rate, shallower cuts) to maintain accuracy, while less dense regions receive aggressive parameters (higher feed rate, deeper cuts) to accelerate material removal. This spatial differentiation maintains accuracy where needed while maximizing efficiency where possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting parameters are dynamically adjusted during the procedure based on real-time density detection. The system transitions from a static parameter set optimized for dense materials to a dynamic parameter strategy that adapts to local material properties, thereby reducing procedure time without sacrificing accuracy in critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12220192B2Robotic systems and methods for controlling a tool to remove material from a workpiece
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 MAKO SURGICAL CORP
  • US12220192B2 patent drawing
  • US12220192B2 patent drawing
  • US12220192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surgical system and method involve a manipulator including a plurality of links and joints and a tool coupled to the manipulator. A navigation system includes a localizer, a first tracker coupled to the robotic manipulator or the tool, and a second tracker coupled to a workpiece. Controller(s) determine, from the navigation system, a pose of the tool relative to the workpiece. The controller(s) control the robotic manipulator to facilitate removal of a first portion from the workpiece with the tool and sense interaction between the tool and the workpiece during removal of the first portion to detect a density of the workpiece. The controller(s) control the robotic manipulator to facilitate removal of a second portion from the workpiece with the tool, wherein a cutting depth for the second portion is based, at least in part, on the detected density.