Robotic Brake Bleeding Control via Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated systems for bleeding air brakes face challenges in accurately locating and actuating the brake lever due to variations in vehicle designs, leading to detection and control errors, which can result in incomplete bleeding and increased time and resource consumption.

Innovation Solution

A robotic control system equipped with an imaging sensor, encoder, and processors that use closed-loop feedback to generate and adjust a motion trajectory for a robotic arm to precisely locate and actuate the brake lever, reducing errors through continuous perception and displacement feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If an automated system is used to bleed air brakes, then safety risks and operational costs are reduced, but reliability and precision of brake lever actuation deteriorate due to vehicle design variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of brake bleedingVSAvoidreliability of brake lever actuation
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs imaging sensors to continuously detect the brake lever position and provides feedback to the control system. The control system adjusts the robotic arm's motion in real-time based on this feedback, enabling closed-loop control that compensates for vehicle design variations and ensures reliable brake lever actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic motion trajectories that can be adjusted in real-time based on detected brake lever position and vehicle-specific characteristics. The robotic arm's speed, position, and force application are dynamically modified during operation to adapt to different vehicle designs and ensure successful brake bleeding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a fixed motion trajectory is used for the robotic arm, then control simplicity is maintained, but detection and control errors increase due to inability to adapt to brake lever position variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidbrake lever position detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The imaging sensor continuously monitors the brake lever position and provides feedback to the control system. This feedback enables real-time adjustment of the motion trajectory, allowing the system to maintain high detection precision without requiring overly complex pre-programmed paths for every possible scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own imaging sensor to automatically detect and locate the brake lever position, eliminating the need for external calibration or manual positioning. The control system self-adjusts the motion trajectory based on the detected position, reducing the need for complex external setup procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the robotic arm moves quickly to reduce operation time, then productivity increases, but control precision and accuracy of brake lever actuation decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake bleeding operation speedVSAvoidbrake lever actuation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic speed adjustment during the robotic arm's motion. The arm moves quickly during transit phases but automatically reduces speed when approaching the brake lever and during actuation phases. This dynamic speed control allows the system to maintain high overall productivity while ensuring precise brake lever actuation when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The imaging sensor continuously tracks the brake lever position throughout the robotic arm's motion, providing continuous feedback that enables precise control even during high-speed operation. This continuous monitoring ensures that speed increases do not compromise actuation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10029372B2Control system and method for brake bleeding
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US10029372B2 patent drawing
  • US10029372B2 patent drawing
  • US10029372B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a machine assembly, an imaging sensor, an encoder, and one or more processors. The machine assembly is movable to actuate a brake lever of a vehicle in order to open a valve of an air brake system of the vehicle. The imaging sensor acquires perception information of a working environment that includes the brake lever. The encoder detects a displaced position of the machine assembly relative to a reference position of the machine assembly. The one or more processors detect a position of the brake lever relative to the machine assembly based on the acquired perception information and the detected displacement of the arm. The one or more processors generate a motion trajectory for the machine assembly that provides a path to the brake lever. The one or more processors drive movement of the machine assembly along the motion trajectory towards the brake lever.