Robotic Build Planning with Real-Time Buildability Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated manufacturing processes face challenges in adapting to deviations from product models during construction, leading to potential defects and inefficiencies, as existing systems struggle to adjust sequences of tasks in real-time to ensure buildability without altering the product model.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that performs buildability analysis to detect deviations and generates new sequences of tasks, allowing robotic devices to continue building a product according to the original model by adapting to issues encountered during the construction process, preserving work already done and minimizing the need for intensive computing and time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system executes the first sequence of tasks to build the product according to the model, then the product can be built following the original plan, but deviations may occur that prevent successful completion

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebuildabilityVSAvoidtask sequence adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the task sequence based on real-time buildability analysis results. When deviations are detected during execution, the system generates and implements alternative task sequences, transforming a static construction plan into a dynamic adaptive process that responds to changing conditions while maintaining product quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs buildability analysis during task execution to detect deviations from the product model. This feedback mechanism identifies issues such as geometric conflicts or manufacturing constraints that prevent successful completion, enabling the system to adjust the task sequence accordingly and maintain reliable product construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system generates a new sequence of tasks to accommodate deviations, then the product can still be completed according to the model, but additional computing time and complexity are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct completion feasibilityVSAvoidtask sequence generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs buildability analysis during the execution of the first task sequence to identify potential issues before they prevent product completion. By detecting deviations early and generating alternative task sequences proactively, the system avoids costly rework and minimizes delays, ensuring timely product completion even when adjustments are needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If the system performs buildability analysis during task execution, then deviations can be detected and corrected, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeviation detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis through automated buildability analysis during task execution. By using its own resources and algorithms to detect deviations and generate corrective task sequences, the system maintains high manufacturing precision without requiring external intervention, balancing accuracy with operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11256240B2Planning and adapting projects based on a buildability analysis
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 INTRINSIC INNOVATION LLC
  • US11256240B2 patent drawing
  • US11256240B2 patent drawing
  • US11256240B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a worksite automation process that involves: generating a first sequence of tasks to build the product according to a model. The process further involves causing one or more robotic devices to build the product by beginning to execute the first sequence of tasks. Further, during the execution of the first sequence of tasks, performing a buildability analysis to determine a feasibility of completing the product by executing the first sequence of tasks. Based on the analysis, determining that it is not feasible to complete the product by executing the first sequence of tasks, and in response, generating a second sequence of tasks to complete the product according to the model. Then, causing the one or more robotic devices to continue building the product by beginning to execute the second sequence of tasks.