Robotic Confectionary Arrangement System for Custom Pattern Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems fail to enable customers to design and automatically arrange confectionary pieces in unique patterns quickly and easily, lacking the ability to customize candy arrangements according to individual preferences.

Innovation Solution

A confectionary image design system comprising a kiosk or web-based interface that allows users to select points on a grid to define patterns, with a one-to-one correspondence to confectionary pieces, and a robotic system that retrieves specific colored pieces from containers to arrange them on a substrate based on user-defined designs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional automatic decorating machines are used, then production speed is improved, but customization capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts between automated high-speed production and customizable design through a hybrid architecture. The robotic assembly system provides automated speed while the graphical user interface enables real-time customization, allowing the system to switch between standardized and custom patterns without sacrificing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The assembly system serves multiple functions: it can execute pre-programmed standardized patterns for high-speed production, or follow user-defined custom patterns through the graphical interface. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by making the system both a high-speed automated machine and a customizable design tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional systems with predetermined designs are used, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but customer engagement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcustomer engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables customers to serve themselves by directly designing patterns through the graphical user interface. Customers can select colors, adjust parameters, and create custom designs without requiring complex manual assembly or specialized knowledge, making the process both simple for customers and engaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical user interface acts as an intermediary between the customer's design intent and the robotic assembly system. It translates simple customer selections into complex assembly instructions, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while dramatically improving customer engagement through direct design participation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual arrangement methods are used, then customization capability is improved, but production speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical arrangement with an automated robotic assembly system controlled by software. The robot executes customer-designed patterns automatically, maintaining full customization capability while dramatically increasing production speed by eliminating manual labor bottlenecks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary design work through the graphical interface before physical assembly begins. Customers define their patterns in advance, and the robotic system then executes the assembly automatically, combining the customization of manual design with the speed of automated execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If a grid-based selection interface is used, then design precision is improved, but interface complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign precisionVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows customers to adjust key parameters such as pattern size, color selection, and density through simplified controls. By changing these high-level parameters rather than requiring precise coordinate input, the system maintains design precision while reducing interface complexity to intuitive selections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP1941470B1System and method for designing and producing confectionary arrangement
Publication Date: 2019.02.27 MARS INC
  • EP1941470B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1941470B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1941470B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Confectionary image design system including a graphical user interface through which a user defines a pattern of confectionary pieces to be arranged on a substrate. A computer processor controls the graphical user interface through which the user defines the pattern, and provides instructions for arranging the confectionary pieces in the defined pattern. A container retains the confectionary pieces used to form the defined pattern. A robot receives from the computer processor the instructions for arranging the confectionary pieces, retrieves the confectionary pieces stored in the container, and arranges the pieces on the substrate in the pattern defined by the user.