Robotic Surgery Control Arm Ergonomics With Four-Bar Linkage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current control arm assemblies for robotic surgical systems are not optimized for comfortable and efficient operation, lacking ergonomic design and easy connectivity, which can lead to clinician fatigue and reduced precision during surgical procedures.

Innovation Solution

The control arm assembly features a gimbal that is movable and rotatable about three axes, coupled with a handle assembly that includes a first actuator mechanically linked to a controller via a four-bar linkage, allowing for comfortable finger control and easy connection/disconnection, with a biased actuator position that reduces finger fatigue and enhances precision through mechanical and electrical signal conversion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional control arm assembly is used, then the structure is simple, but the ergonomics are poor and finger fatigue occurs during prolonged use

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveergonomicsVSAvoidstructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control arm assembly is divided into modular components: a handle assembly with finger-actuated controls, a four-bar linkage mechanism, and a gimbal assembly. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for ergonomics while maintaining overall system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A four-bar linkage mechanism serves as an intermediary between the finger-actuated control inputs and the gimbal movements. This mechanical intermediary translates small finger motions into precise gimbal rotations, reducing finger strain while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the control arm assembly is designed for precision control, then the precision is improved, but the connection and disconnection becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidconnectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control arm assembly is divided into modular components: a handle assembly with finger-actuated controls, a four-bar linkage mechanism, and a gimbal assembly. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for ergonomics while maintaining overall system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connector incorporates a detent mechanism that provides snap-fit engagement for secure connection while allowing quick release. This dynamic connection system maintains precise alignment during operation but enables rapid attachment and detachment when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the actuator range of motion is increased, then the control flexibility is improved, but the finger strain increases during prolonged procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol flexibilityVSAvoidfinger comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A four-bar linkage mechanism serves as an intermediary between the finger-actuated control inputs and the gimbal movements. This mechanical intermediary translates small finger motions into precise gimbal rotations, reducing finger strain while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The connector incorporates a detent mechanism that provides snap-fit engagement for secure connection while allowing quick release. This dynamic connection system maintains precise alignment during operation but enables rapid attachment and detachment when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides improved ergonomics and reduced clinician fatigue by allowing easier control of robotic surgical tools, enhancing precision and minimizing finger strain during prolonged surgical procedures.

Implementation Method 1

The first actuator is mechanically coupled to the controller via a four-bar linkage such that actuation of the first actuator causes mechanical movement of a component of the controller which is converted by the controller into an electrical signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical linkage (four-bar linkage): Four-Bar Linkage

Implementation Method 2

a gimbal moveable and rotatable about three axes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGimbal mechanism: Gimbal

Data Source

PatentUS11653991B2Control arm assemblies for robotic surgical systems
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 COVIDIEN LP
  • US11653991B2 patent drawing
  • US11653991B2 patent drawing
  • US11653991B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control arm assembly for controlling a robot system includes a gimbal that is moveable and rotatable about three axes, and a handle assembly coupled to the gimbal. The handle assembly includes a body portion having a controller disposed therein and a first actuator disposed thereon. The first actuator is mechanically coupled to the controller via a four-bar linkage such that actuation of the first actuator causes mechanical movement of a component of the controller which is converted by the controller into an electrical signal.