Non-Uniform Shelving Layout for Robotic Crate Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern logistic centers face inefficiencies in storage space utilization due to uniform vertical spacing between shelves, which restricts the handling of crates of varying sizes and limits accessibility, leading to suboptimal storage capacity and accessibility efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a shelving system with non-uniform vertical spacing between horizontal storage surfaces and a computerized control system that routes lift robots to optimize storage and retrieval based on crate size, allowing for the use of crates of different heights and widths, and relocating items to smaller storage locations when available.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If uniform vertical spacing between shelves is used, then structural simplicity and ease of manufacture are improved, but storage capacity and accessibility for varied crate sizes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The shelving structure is segmented into multiple zones with different vertical spacing configurations. Each zone can be independently designed to accommodate specific crate size ranges, allowing the system to handle varied crate dimensions while maintaining manufacturing simplicity within each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the shelving structure have different vertical spacing characteristics. Specifically, certain shelving units have reduced vertical spacing in specific zones to optimize storage for particular crate height ranges, while other regions maintain standard spacing for different crate types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If non-uniform vertical spacing between shelves is implemented, then storage capacity and adaptability for varied crate sizes are improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shelving system incorporates universal components and standardized connection mechanisms that can accommodate both uniform and non-uniform spacing configurations. This allows the same basic structural elements to be reused across different spacing zones, reducing overall manufacturing complexity despite the varied spacing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows for adjustable and reconfigurable spacing parameters through modular design elements. Vertical spacing can be modified by reconfiguring modular components rather than requiring custom-made parts for each spacing variation, thereby managing device complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If robots are routed through tracks for crate delivery and retrieval, then automation and productivity are improved, but energy consumption and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary routing calculations and optimization to determine the most energy-efficient paths for robots. By pre-planning routes that minimize travel distance and avoid unnecessary movements, the system reduces energy consumption while maintaining high productivity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The routing system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor robot position, energy consumption, and task completion status in real-time. This feedback enables dynamic route optimization, where paths are adjusted based on current system state to minimize energy usage while ensuring timely crate delivery and retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Use of energy by moving object

If average traveling distance for robots is reduced, then energy efficiency and maintenance costs are improved, but storage accessibility and retrieval time may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidretrieval time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes robot routing by utilizing three-dimensional space more effectively. Robots can travel through vertical and horizontal track intersections to reach storage locations more directly, reducing the average traveling distance without compromising accessibility. This multi-dimensional routing approach allows shortcuts that would not be possible in a two-dimensional plane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical routing with computerized control and intelligent path planning algorithms. The computerized control system calculates optimal routes that minimize travel distance while ensuring timely access to all storage locations, substituting mechanical route fixedness with flexible, computationally-determined paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11136189B2Robotic delivery and retrieval of crates to and from non-uniformly sized storage spaces in a versatile shelving array
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 GET FABRIC LTD
  • US11136189B2 patent drawing
  • US11136189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A storage setup and method for robotic delivery and retrieval of crates from shelving blocks are disclosed. At least one shelving block in the setup comprises non-uniformly spaced apart storage surfaces. The storage surfaces are accessible to lift-robots through a network of tracks comprising intersecting vertically and horizontally oriented tracks. A computerized control system is configured to differentiate between storage locations based on which crate sizes from at least two different ranges of crate sizes a storage location can store. The storage may be automatically optimized by routing robots to store crates in storage locations sized in correlation with the size of the crate to be stored.