Robotic Delivery Dispatch With Total Cost Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Autonomous Ground Vehicles (AGVs) are underutilized for delivery due to perceived expense, and users lack comprehensive information on the true cost of delivery options, including traditional and robotic services.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a user device executing an application to present multiple delivery options, considering opportunity costs and user behavior, and dispatches appropriate robotic mechanisms (UAV or AGV) for delivery, integrating with a database server and dispatch module to optimize delivery choices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional delivery services are used, then delivery cost is reduced, but delivery speed and convenience are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery costVSAvoiddelivery speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of cost information presentation by providing comprehensive total cost breakdowns including time costs, opportunity costs, and convenience costs. This transforms the cost comparison from a simple price metric to a multi-dimensional value assessment, enabling users to recognize that robotic delivery may be more valuable when all factors are considered

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by analyzing user responses and behavior patterns to continuously refine cost calculations and delivery recommendations. User feedback on actual delivery experiences feeds back into the system to improve future cost estimations and matching algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If robotic delivery mechanisms (UAV/AGV) are deployed, then delivery speed and convenience are improved, but perceived expense increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery speedVSAvoidperceived expense
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of comprehensive cost analysis and comparison that mediates between the user's perception of expense and the actual value delivered. By breaking down all costs associated with traditional delivery and presenting them alongside robotic delivery options, the system acts as a mediator to reframe the expense perception

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical decision-making process with an automated algorithmic system that calculates and presents total cost comparisons. This substitution eliminates the need for users to manually assess various cost factors, providing an objective analysis that challenges traditional expense perceptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If comprehensive cost information is provided to users, then user decision-making is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser decision-makingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments comprehensive cost information into distinct, manageable components such as base delivery cost, time costs, opportunity costs, and convenience costs. This segmentation allows users to process information in organized chunks rather than facing a monolithic complex dataset, while the system handles the complexity of calculating and integrating all these factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal platform that handles multiple functions: cost calculation, data analysis, user behavior tracking, recommendation generation, and communication with delivery providers. This multi-functional system consolidates various complex operations into a single integrated solution that serves all users with diverse delivery needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If user behavior data is analyzed to optimize delivery recommendations, then delivery optimization is improved, but data privacy concerns increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery optimizationVSAvoiddata privacy concerns
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by analyzing user behavior data at an individual level to provide personalized delivery recommendations, while implementing privacy protections that prevent broad generalizations about user groups. Each user's data is processed with specific privacy safeguards tailored to their preferences and the sensitivity of their information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12354051B2Autonomous robot delivery systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US12354051B2 patent drawing
  • US12354051B2 patent drawing
  • US12354051B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic delivery system includes a server, a dispatch module, and a robotic delivery vehicle. The dispatch module transmits a suggested item to the dispatch application being executable on a client device operated by a user; and receives, from the dispatch application, a selection of the suggested item from the user of the client device.