Vision-Guided Robotic Filling for Aseptic Container Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pharmaceutical filling systems lack flexibility and quality, particularly in small cleanroom facilities, and often require human intervention, which can lead to contamination and increased risk.

Innovation Solution

A robotic filling system with an isolator chamber, optical sensors, and servo-driven robotic arms that allow for aseptic filling and stoppering of containers without mechanical handling, enabling flexible and high-quality filling of variously sized and shaped containers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If small cleanroom facilities are used for pharmaceutical filling operations, then facility size and cost are reduced, but product quality and sterility assurance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacility sizeVSAvoidproduct quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical handling operations with an automated robotic system that includes a robotic arm, vision system, and automated filling mechanism. This substitution eliminates human intervention in the sterile field, maintaining high product quality and sterility assurance even in smaller facility environments where traditional manual cleanroom operations would compromise quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a controlled sterile environment within the isolator that maintains aseptic conditions through filtered air supply and negative pressure control. This inert atmosphere approach allows small facilities to achieve the same sterility levels as large pharmaceutical facilities by creating a localized controlled environment that protects product quality regardless of overall facility size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

2Manufacturing precision

If large pharmaceutical facilities with high-speed lines are used, then product quality improves, but flexibility with respect to batch size, variations of product, and timing deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic robotic system with programmable control that can adapt its operations based on different product types, batch sizes, and timing requirements. The robotic arm, vision system, and filling parameters can be reconfigured through software programming, enabling the same system to maintain high product quality across varying production scenarios without the rigid constraints of dedicated high-speed lines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal filling system that can handle multiple product types and container configurations through programmable robotic operations. The system incorporates adjustable filling parameters, multiple container support positions, and reconfigurable end-effectors, allowing a single facility to perform both small-batch customized fills and larger production runs with the same equipment that ensures high product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If human intervention is used in filling operations, then operational flexibility improves, but contamination risk and occupational exposure to hazardous drugs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidcontamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human operators with an automated robotic system that performs all filling operations within the isolator. The robotic arm, controlled by programmable logic, executes filling sequences with the same operational flexibility previously requiring human judgment, while completely eliminating human exposure to hazardous drugs and contamination risks in the sterile field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the robotic system as an intermediary between human operators and the sterile field. Humans interact with the system through external interfaces (programming, monitoring, material loading) without entering the isolator, while the robot performs all operations within the controlled environment. This intermediary approach maintains operational flexibility through programmable control while eliminating direct human contact with potential contaminants and hazardous substances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If mechanical container handling is used, then filling speed improves, but contamination risk and adaptability to variously sized and shaped containers deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling speedVSAvoidadaptability to containers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic robotic system with programmable motion control that can adjust its handling approach for each container type. The robotic arm uses vision-guided positioning and programmable speed profiles to achieve high filling speeds while adapting to various container sizes, shapes, and orientations through software configuration rather than fixed mechanical handling mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces fixed mechanical handling devices with a programmable robotic system that uses software control to adapt to different container configurations. The robotic arm incorporates vision systems and programmable motion sequences that enable high-speed operation while maintaining adaptability to variously sized and shaped containers through digital reconfiguration rather than physical adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2266068B1Robotic filling systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.12.24 VANRX PHARMASYST
  • EP2266068B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2266068B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2266068B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Systems and methods permit filling containers with a product. A filling arm is disposed within a chamber. An optical sensor is configured to sense openings of the containers within the chamber. Locations of the sensed openings are used to guide the filling arm to fill the containers with a product.