Robotic Finger Phalanx Stopper Structure for Hyperextension Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic hands lack a simple and damage-proof design for grasping operations, particularly in scenarios where robustness and durability are essential.

Innovation Solution

A finger design for a robotic hand featuring rotatably coupled phalanxes with stopper structures and a transmission assembly, including a torsion spring and rope system, which allows controlled flexion and extension while preventing hyperextension and enhancing strength and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional robotic hand designs are used, then grasping operations can be performed, but the structure becomes complex and damage-proof ability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage-proof abilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic finger is divided into multiple phalanxes (proximal, intermediate, distal) that are rotatably coupled together. Each phalanx can move independently, allowing complex grasping motions to be achieved through simple rotational joints rather than complex mechanical structures. This segmentation reduces overall structural complexity while maintaining functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A stopper structure is built into the phalanx assembly to prevent hyperextension before damage can occur. The stopper members extend from opposing phalanxes and physically limit the range of motion, cushioning against excessive forces and preventing structural damage in advance. This proactive protection enhances reliability without adding complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Strength

If robust phalanxes are used to withstand external forces, then durability increases, but the ability to perform delicate grasping operations decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidgrasping capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The phalanxes are designed with rotational joints that allow dynamic adjustment of finger position and curvature. The stopper structure dynamically limits motion only when necessary (during hyperextension), while permitting full range of motion during normal grasping operations. This dynamic design enables the finger to adapt to various grasping tasks while maintaining structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The stopper members are strategically positioned at specific locations on the phalanxes where they will engage only during hyperextension. This localized protection mechanism allows the majority of the phalanx structure to remain lightweight and flexible for delicate operations, while providing targeted strength and protection only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If stopper structures are added to prevent hyperextension, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehyperextension preventionVSAvoidcomponent quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stopper members are integrated directly into the phalanx structure itself rather than being separate external components. The stoppers are formed as extensions of the phalanx bodies, merging the protective function with the structural elements already present in the design. This integration adds minimal complexity while providing reliable hyperextension prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides a robust and durable robotic finger capable of withstanding external forces, preventing damage and increasing service life through controlled movement and reduced component complexity.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic member, the first end of which is connected to the rotating member and the second end of which is connected to the base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a rope, the first end of which is connected to the rotating member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension: Tension

Data Source

PatentUS10518420B1Finger of robotic hand and robot having the same
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 UBTECH ROBOTICS CORP LTD
  • US10518420B1 patent drawing
  • US10518420B1 patent drawing
  • US10518420B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A finger of a robotic hand includes a phalanx portion including two phalanxes rotatably coupled to each other, one of the two phalanxes being rotatable about a rotation axis with respect to the other one of the two phalanxes; and a stopper structure including a first stopper member connected to the one of the two phalanxes and a second stopper member connected to the other one of the two phalanxes. The first stopper member extends around the rotation axis, and a circumferential space is defined between the first stopper member and the second stopper member and allowing the first stopper member to rotate together with the one of the two phalanxes in a predetermined range.