Robotic Foam Insulation for Hard-to-Reach Building Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for insulating building surfaces, particularly in older structures, are labor-intensive, require significant human input, and often result in uneven finishes, with challenges in accessing confined spaces and maintaining the integrity of existing structures.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a robotic system that sprays and shapes expanding foam materials, such as polyurethane, to create a thermal insulation layer on building surfaces, allowing for autonomous application, precise shaping, and finishing treatments, reducing labor and material requirements while improving consistency and accessibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If spray insulation foam is applied manually to insulate building surfaces, then insulation coverage is achieved, but the process becomes labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsulation application speedVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system autonomously navigates and positions itself to apply insulation foam without human intervention. The robot self-manages the entire insulation application process including movement, spraying, and shaping operations, eliminating the need for manual labor while maintaining controlled complexity through automated control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations of workers are replaced with an automated robotic system that integrates spraying mechanisms, navigation capabilities, and shaping tools. The robot substitutes human physical labor with automated mechanical and electronic systems, significantly improving productivity while managing complexity through integrated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If manual methods are used to access confined spaces for insulation, then insulation can be applied, but worker safety risks increase due to hazardous conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker safety risksVSAvoidrobotic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system autonomously operates in confined and hazardous spaces without requiring human workers to be present. The robot self-manages navigation, insulation application, and shaping tasks in environments that would be unsafe for humans, eliminating exposure to chemical hazards, confined space risks, and physical dangers while maintaining controlled system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system acts as an intermediary between the insulation application task and the hazardous environment. Instead of humans directly entering dangerous confined spaces, the robot mediates by performing all operations remotely, protecting workers from harmful factors while managing the complexity of operating in constrained environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If traditional insulation methods are used in underfloor cavities, then insulation is applied, but floor structures must be dismantled causing disruption to occupants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to underfloor cavityVSAvoidoccupant disruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system autonomously accesses underfloor cavities through small access points and performs insulation application without requiring dismantling of floor structures. The robot self-manages navigation in the confined cavity space, applies insulation through targeted spraying, and completes shaping operations, all while the building remains occupied and functional, eliminating time loss and disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring complete dismantling of floor structures for access, the method uses segmented access points - small openings sufficient for robot entry. The floor structure remains largely intact and segmented only where minimal access is needed, allowing insulation application while maintaining structural integrity and avoiding occupant disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If expanding foam material is sprayed to cover building surfaces, then insulation layer is formed, but surface unevenness and excess material require additional shaping work

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsulation layer uniformityVSAvoidinsulation application speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system merges the insulation spraying operation with the shaping operation into a single integrated process. The robot simultaneously sprays expanding foam insulation and shapes the material to the required profile in one continuous motion, eliminating the need for separate shaping steps. This combination maintains insulation layer uniformity while preserving application speed, as both functions are performed concurrently by the same robotic system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables faster, more efficient, and cost-effective insulation of building surfaces with reduced disruption, improved quality, and the ability to insulate hard-to-reach areas without the need for scaffolding, while maintaining the structural integrity of existing buildings.

Implementation Method 1

spraying an expandable foam material onto the surface and allowing the foam material to solidify whereby to form a covering of the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExpansion:

Implementation Method 2

allowing the foam material to solidify whereby to form a covering of the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification:

Implementation Method 3

spraying an expandable foam material onto the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpray deposition: Spray

Data Source

PatentUS11077457B2Method of covering a surface of a building and robot therefor
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 Q BOT
  • US11077457B2 patent drawing
  • US11077457B2 patent drawing
  • US11077457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of covering a surface of a building, the method comprising spraying an expandable foam material onto the surface and allowing the foam material to solidify whereby to form a covering of the surface and a robotic vehicle configured to carry out the method.