Robotic Food Assembly With 3D Sensing for Precise Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current food industry systems lack an efficient and automated method for assembling foodstuff, particularly in high-throughput applications like airline catering and low-throughput settings like restaurants, which often rely on manual labor and are prone to inconsistencies and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A robotic foodstuff assembly system comprising a robot arm, a frame, foodstuff bins, a sensor suite, a food utensil, and a computing system, which enables the picking of foodstuff from bins and placement into containers, facilitating bulk material transfer and adaptable to various food assembly applications through modular design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual labor is used for food assembly, then flexibility in handling various food items is maintained, but efficiency and consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly efficiencyVSAvoidassembly consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system performs food assembly autonomously without continuous human intervention. The robot arm independently picks food items from bins, determines placement locations, and places them in containers, enabling self-service operation that simultaneously improves efficiency and consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical assembly with an automated robotic system equipped with sensors and control algorithms. The robotic arm with food utensil substitutes human hands, while image processing and depth mapping replace human visual assessment, achieving both higher productivity and consistent results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated robotic systems are implemented, then productivity and consistency are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system is designed with multi-functionality to handle various food items and container types using the same basic apparatus. The food utensil can adapt to different food textures and sizes, and the imaging system can process diverse food presentations, reducing the need for multiple specialized devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computing system that acts as a bridge between the simple robotic arm and the complex tasks of food assembly. The computing system handles image processing, depth mapping, and decision-making, allowing the physical robotic components to remain relatively simple while achieving sophisticated assembly capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If precise robotic placement is implemented, then food waste is reduced and aesthetics are improved, but measurement and detection difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood placement precisionVSAvoidfood surface assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D image capture to 3D depth mapping by processing images through camera calibration and depth calculation algorithms. This dimensional transformation enables the system to assess food surface topography, calculate volumes, and determine precise placement locations in three-dimensional space, overcoming the limitations of flat image analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The imaging system provides continuous feedback about the food bin contents and container state to the control system. By repeatedly capturing images and updating the depth map, the system monitors changes in food levels and placement results, enabling real-time adjustments to maintain precision while managing the complexity of food surface assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250083324A1System and/or method for robotic foodstuff assembly
Publication Date: 2025.03.13 CHEF ROBOTICS INC
  • US20250083324A1 patent drawing
  • US20250083324A1 patent drawing
  • US20250083324A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The foodstuff assembly system can include: a robot arm, a frame, a set of foodstuff bins, a sensor suite, a set of food utensils, and a computing system. The system can optionally include: a container management system, a human machine interface (HMI). However, the foodstuff assembly system 100 can additionally or alternatively include any other suitable set of components. The system functions to enable picking of foodstuff from a set of foodstuff bins and placement into a container (such as a bowl, tray, or other foodstuff receptacle). Additionally or alternatively, the system can function to facilitate transferal of bulk material (e.g., bulk foodstuff) into containers, such as containers moving along a conveyor line.