Robotic Grasp Assessment Using Sensor Feedback in Warehouses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic picking systems face challenges in reliably grasping all types of items, necessitating the development of methods and systems to autonomously assess and improve their grasping techniques.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that involves issuing commands to a robotic manipulator to attempt grasping an item, analyzing data from sensors to determine success, and incorporating corrective actions based on the received data, using various end effectors such as hand, suction, or adhesive devices, and integrating with warehouse management systems for item retrieval and transportation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If robotic manipulators are deployed to perform picking tasks in warehouse environments, then productivity and cost-effectiveness are improved, but the reliability of grasping diverse items deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking task efficiencyVSAvoidgrasping success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs sensor devices (cameras, force sensors, torque sensors) to collect data during grasp attempts and provides feedback to the coordination system. This feedback loop enables the system to analyze sensor data, determine grasp success or failure, and adjust grasping strategies accordingly, thereby improving reliability while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system autonomously assesses its own grasping performance by analyzing sensor data without human intervention. The coordination system automatically determines whether a grasp was successful and issues corrective instructions when needed, enabling the system to self-correct and improve its grasping capability across diverse items

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If autonomous assessment systems are implemented to improve grasping reliability, then device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrasping assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coordination system serves multiple functions: it manages robotic manipulator operations, processes sensor data from various sources (cameras, force sensors, torque sensors), determines grasp success, and issues corrective instructions. This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into a single coordination layer rather than distributing it across multiple specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The coordination system acts as an intermediary between the robotic manipulators and the warehouse management system. It receives commands from the warehouse management system, executes grasping tasks, analyzes sensor data, and reports results, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture by providing a centralized control layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11338436B2Assessing robotic grasping
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 RIGHTHAND ROBOTICS INC
  • US11338436B2 patent drawing
  • US11338436B2 patent drawing
  • US11338436B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for assessing a robotic grasping technique. The system in accordance with various embodiments may include a warehouse management system for retrieving and storing items, a robotic manipulator for grasping an item, and analysis module configured to receive data regarding a first grasp attempt by the robotic manipulator and analyze the received data to determine whether the robotic manipulator successfully grasped the item.