Robotic End Effector Backstop Structure for Stable Compliant Grasping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional robotic end effectors struggle to securely grasp compliant objects like bagged items, as they tend to slip or shift during movement, leading to uneven forces and potential damage to the objects.

Innovation Solution

The use of soft robotic actuators in conjunction with stabilization structures, such as keels, which provide a backstop for the actuators to compress the object, allowing for a more delicate and stable grasp with lower inflation pressure, and adaptive conforming to the object's shape.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional robotic fingers grasp a compliant object tightly, then the object is less likely to slip, but the object may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrasp stabilityVSAvoidobject damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a stabilization structure as an intermediary element between the robotic fingers and the compliant object. This structure provides a backstop that prevents the object from slipping without requiring the fingers to apply excessive grasping force, thereby avoiding damage to the object while maintaining grasp stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The end effector is segmented into multiple functional components: robotic fingers for initial contact and a separate stabilization structure for preventing slippage. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function optimally - the fingers provide gentle contact while the stabilization structure provides the necessary constraint without damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If conventional robotic fingers grasp tightly to prevent slipping, then grasp stability improves, but product damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrasp stabilityVSAvoidproduct integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilization structure acts as a mediator that provides the necessary mechanical constraint to prevent slippage during acceleration and deceleration. By positioning this structure behind the object, it provides a backstop that maintains grasp stability without requiring the fingers to apply damaging forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If soft robotic actuators are used with lower inflation pressure, then object damage is reduced, but grasp stability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject damageVSAvoidgrasp stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilization structure serves as a mediator that compensates for the reduced grasping force from low-pressure actuators. It provides the necessary mechanical support to maintain grasp stability during dynamic operations, allowing the use of lower inflation pressures without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If the end effector structure is simplified, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different object shapes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend effector structureVSAvoidobject shape adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilization structure is designed as a universal component that can work with various actuator configurations and adapt to different object shapes. Its placement and geometry allow it to provide effective support for diverse compliant objects without requiring complex customization, thus maintaining low device complexity while achieving high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the stability of the grasp on compliant objects during acceleration and deceleration, reduces the risk of damage, and allows for efficient handling of various object types without marking surfaces, improving the overall grasp quality and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

The actuators may be inflated with a gas or liquid, such as air, water, or saline

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInflation: Pressurisation

Implementation Method 2

provide a backstop against which the actuators may squeeze the bag or other product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS11220012B2Structure for a robotic end effector
Publication Date: 2022.01.11 SCHMALZ FLEXIBLE GRIPPING INC
  • US11220012B2 patent drawing
  • US11220012B2 patent drawing
  • US11220012B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various stabilization devices for a robotic end of arm tool, such as a robotic gripper, are described. The stabilization device is provided in a palm area of the end of arm tool and serves as a backstop against which actuators of the end of arm tool can push a compliant or slick target object. The stabilization device may take many any of a variety of shapes, depending on the application. Based on the shape of the stabilization device and the action of the robotic gripper on the target object, the target object can be moved or rotated in a more stable configuration, thus allowing the actuators to apply less force while still maintaining a firm grasp of the object.