Robotic Gripper Closure Control for Fast Grip Without Excess Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic grippers face challenges such as high inertia and excessive pinch force during fast closure, early decay of braking mechanisms, difficulty in detecting slipping objects, and cumbersome data connectivity, which can lead to object loss and performance interruptions.

Innovation Solution

A robotic gripper design featuring a DC motor, reduction gear mechanism, and a backdrivable gear system with an encoder and electrically controllable brake, allowing for controlled force application and slip detection, along with a hand-guiding mechanism that interprets operator actions without a pendant, and a connector for reduced cabling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the gripper closes at higher speed, then productivity is improved, but the pinch force becomes excessively high and may damage the object

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing speedVSAvoidpinch force
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of the motor voltage during the closing cycle. The controller adjusts voltage based on the gripper's position and velocity, applying higher voltage during approach and lower voltage during closing to dynamically manage both speed and force throughout the operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (voltage, speed, force) based on the closing phase. The controller modifies motor parameters in real-time to maintain optimal closing speed while preventing excessive pinch force that could damage the object

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a brake mechanism is engaged to hold the object, then the motor can be disengaged to prevent overheating, but the brake has a fall or decay time before engagement which may cause object loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor protectionVSAvoidbrake engagement delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The brake is engaged in advance before the motor needs to be disengaged. The controller activates the brake mechanism prior to motor shutdown, ensuring the object is secured before the motor is turned off to prevent overheating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous control over the gripping action by coordinating brake engagement with motor operation. The brake and motor work in a continuous sequence to ensure the object remains securely held throughout the operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If an encoder and control system are used to detect slippage, then object loss is prevented, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslip detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The encoder provides continuous feedback on the gripper's position and the object's grip status. The controller monitors this feedback to detect slippage conditions and responds by adjusting the gripping force or re-engaging the brake to prevent object loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The gripper achieves controlled and efficient object handling with reduced risk of slipping or loss, improved learning efficiency, and enhanced reliability through precise force management and data connectivity, while minimizing the risk of cabling damage.

Implementation Method 1

DC motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

reduction gear mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 3

electrically controllable brake

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 4

encoder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic sensing: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20240416512A1Robotic gripper
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 ROBOTIQ INC
  • US20240416512A1 patent drawing
  • US20240416512A1 patent drawing
  • US20240416512A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a robot gripper with a closing mechanism that while providing a desirable closing speed avoids exerting a force on the rigid object which is greater than the holding force required to hold the rigid object in the gripper. In another aspect, the present invention provides a robot gripper capable of detecting a slip or loss of an object held by the gripper. In an alternative aspect, the present invention provides a robot gripper capable of being hand guided. In another aspect, the invention provides a robot gripper brake drive circuit with faster operation. In one other aspect, the invention provides a connector for connecting a robot end effector to a robot arm with an adjustable cable.