Robotic Vacuum Gripper Control for Unstable Seal Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic grippers face challenges in achieving a secure grasp on objects due to inconsistent vacuum assembly seals, leading to inefficiencies and the need for multiple specialized robots or loosely integrated systems that are slow and inflexible.

Innovation Solution

Intelligent control of individual vacuum assemblies in a robotic gripper, including activation, reactivation, and deactivation based on seal quality, location, and mask information, to enhance grasp quality and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple vacuum assemblies are used to improve grasp quality, then the reliability of grasping is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrasp qualityVSAvoidgripper structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gripper is divided into multiple independently controllable vacuum assemblies (e.g., suction cups), each capable of forming a seal with the object surface. This segmentation allows individual assemblies to be activated or deactivated based on seal quality, improving overall grasp reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different vacuum assemblies are assigned different control strategies based on their local conditions. The system evaluates seal quality at each assembly location and adjusts activation status accordingly, enabling optimized grasp performance tailored to specific regions of the gripper-object interface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If vacuum assemblies are deactivated when seal quality is poor, then the grasp quality is improved, but the productivity decreases due to retry attempts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrasp qualityVSAvoidtask completion speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of seal quality before finalizing the grasp. When an assembly shows poor seal quality, it is deactivated in advance and marked for potential reactivation later, allowing the system to prepare for retry attempts without delaying the overall grasp completion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system implements periodic reevaluation of vacuum assemblies during the grasp sequence. Disabled assemblies can be reactived in subsequent periods if conditions have improved, enabling iterative optimization of grasp quality while maintaining progress toward task completion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If individual vacuum assemblies are controlled independently, then the adaptability to different objects is improved, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject adaptationVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the activation state of individual vacuum assemblies based on real-time seal quality feedback. This dynamic control enables the gripper to adapt to various object shapes, sizes, and surface properties by selectively engaging assemblies that form good seals while deactivating those that do not

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor seal quality at each vacuum assembly location. Based on this feedback, the control algorithm automatically adjusts assembly activation status, enabling adaptive grasping performance while managing control complexity through closed-loop regulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves grasp quality and efficiency by optimizing vacuum assembly control, enabling a single robot to perform multiple tasks with agility and speed, reducing the need for multiple specialized robots and enhancing system integration.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum-based gripper... engaging a large number of vacuum assemblies with the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

vacuum assemblies of the gripper that are able to form a good seal with the object being manipulated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS20260109038A1Methods and apparatus for controlling a gripper of a robotic device
Publication Date: 2026.04.23 BOSTON DYNAMICS INC
  • US20260109038A1 patent drawing
  • US20260109038A1 patent drawing
  • US20260109038A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for controlling a robotic gripper of a robotic device are provided. The method includes activating a plurality of vacuum assemblies of the robotic gripper to grasp one or more objects, disabling one or more of the plurality of vacuum assemblies having a seal quality with the one or more objects that is less than a first threshold, assigning a score to each of the one or more disabled vacuum assemblies, reactivating the one or more disabled vacuum assemblies in an order based, at least in part, on the assigned scores, and grasping the one or more objects with the robotic gripper when a grasp quality of the robotic gripper is higher than a second threshold.