Robotic Imaging Arm Force Feedback for Self-Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic imaging systems face challenges in avoiding collisions between multiple components such as the camera unit and robotic arm, storage unit, and image plane, which can lead to self-collisions and hinder smooth operation.

Innovation Solution

A robotic imaging system with a force-based sensor and controller that detects user-imparted forces and torques, calculates correction forces using proportional-derivative control, and applies these forces to modify the movement sequence to avoid predefined buffer zones and keep-out zones, ensuring smooth transitions and collision avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a robotic arm is used to move the camera in a movement sequence, then the imaging efficiency is improved, but self-collisions between the robotic arm and camera unit or storage unit may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging efficiencyVSAvoidcollision avoidance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by defining buffer zones and keep-out zones before the actual imaging procedure begins. The controller is pre-programmed with safety boundaries and correction force parameters, allowing the robotic arm to operate autonomously within safe limits without real-time human intervention, thus maintaining high imaging efficiency while preventing collisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback through force-based sensors that monitor the robotic arm's movement in real-time. When the camera or robotic arm approaches a buffer zone or keep-out zone, the sensors detect the position and the controller automatically applies correction forces to redirect the movement, creating a closed-loop safety mechanism that prevents collisions while allowing efficient autonomous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple components are incorporated in the robotic system, then the functionality is enhanced, but the complexity of avoiding self-collisions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidcollision avoidance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system is segmented into distinct functional components: buffer zone definition, keep-out zone definition, force-based sensing, and correction force application. Each component handles a specific aspect of collision avoidance, allowing the system to manage multiple components (robotic arm, camera, storage unit) without overwhelming complexity. The segmentation enables modular troubleshooting and maintenance while preserving enhanced functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the force-based sensors and the robotic arm actuators. It processes sensor data, determines whether correction forces are needed based on predefined safety zones, and calculates appropriate correction forces. This intermediary layer simplifies the overall system complexity by centralizing the collision avoidance logic while allowing the robotic components to maintain their enhanced functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If correction forces are applied to modify the movement sequence, then collision avoidance is achieved, but the smoothness of movement may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidmovement smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies correction forces before the robotic arm actually reaches the buffer zone or keep-out zone boundaries. By detecting approach trends and applying gradual correction forces in advance, the system cushions the robotic arm's movement path, redirecting it smoothly away from safety boundaries rather than making abrupt stops or corrections, thus maintaining movement smoothness while ensuring collision avoidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents collisions by applying correction forces based on real-time sensor data, ensuring smooth and controlled movement of the camera and robotic arm, enhancing operational efficiency and safety.

Implementation Method 1

A force-based sensor is configured to detect and transmit sensor data related to at least one of force and/or torque imparted by a user for moving the camera

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing: Force

Implementation Method 2

The controller is adapted to calculate the respective correction force using a closed-loop control module, including at least one of a proportional-integral controller, a proportional-derivative controller and a proportional-integral-derivative controller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProportional-derivative control: Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250339965A1Robotic imaging system with force-based collision avoidance mode
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 ALCON INC
  • US20250339965A1 patent drawing
  • US20250339965A1 patent drawing
  • US20250339965A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic imaging system includes a camera configured to obtain one or more images of a target site. A robotic arm is operatively connected to the camera, the robotic arm being adapted to selectively move the camera in a movement sequence. A force-based sensor is configured to detect and transmit sensor data related to at least one of force and/or torque imparted by a user for moving the camera. The system includes a controller configured to receive the sensor data. The controller has a processor and tangible, non-transitory memory on which instructions are recorded. The controller is adapted to selectively execute a collision avoidance mode, including applying a respective correction force to modify the movement sequence when the camera and/or the robotic arm enter a predefined buffer zone.