Robotic Ingredient Processing System for Flexible Food Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional food manufacturing processes are labor-intensive, inflexible, and costly due to the need for extensive equipment and fixed layouts, leading to inefficiencies in ingredient processing and handling, particularly in large-scale production where inconsistent cooking profiles and cumbersome equipment handling become significant challenges.

Innovation Solution

A flexible processing system featuring moveable receptacles and processing devices, managed by a robotic transfer system that allows for various combinations and configurations, reducing the need for extensive piping and human intervention, and enabling scalable and automated food production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If large receptacles are used to increase throughput at the cooking/mixing phase, then productivity increases, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inconsistent cooking profiles across the receptacle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput at cooking/mixing phaseVSAvoidcooking profile consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the cooking process into multiple smaller receptacles (e.g., four 500L receptacles instead of one 2000L receptacle) that can be processed in parallel. Each receptacle maintains consistent cooking profiles independently, while the overall system achieves high throughput through simultaneous processing of multiple segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If traditional fixed layouts with extensive piping are used, then reliability is improved through stable infrastructure, but device complexity increases due to the network of pipes, valves and pumps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfrastructure stabilityVSAvoidpiping network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system removes the complex piping network, valves, and pumps from the traditional fixed layout. Receptacles are positioned on mobile platforms that can be moved directly to processing equipment, eliminating the need for extensive fixed infrastructure while maintaining reliable material transfer capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static fixed layout to a dynamic configuration where receptacles on mobile platforms can be repositioned as needed. This allows the same infrastructure to adapt to different production requirements without requiring complex piping reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If manual ingredient loading is used, then ease of operation is improved through direct human control, but productivity deteriorates as loading takes 2-3 times the duration of the cooking phase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect human controlVSAvoidloading time vs cooking time ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs automated robotic arms and conveyors that perform ingredient loading without human intervention. The robotic systems automatically transfer ingredients from storage containers to receptacles, reducing loading time to a fraction of the cooking phase duration while maintaining operational control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If platforms are built adjacent to receptacles for manual operation, then ease of operation is improved through worker access, but device complexity increases due to the requirement for extensive platforms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker access to receptaclesVSAvoidplatform infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system removes the need for fixed platforms by using mobile platforms with receptacles that can be moved to processing positions. Workers or robotic systems access the receptacles during loading/unloading phases, but no permanent platform infrastructure is required, significantly reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3355723B1Ingredient processing system & method
Publication Date: 2021.04.07 OLYMPUS AUTOMATION
  • EP3355723B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3355723B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3355723B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~5

AI summary

An ingredient processing system, including: at least one moveable receptacle (5) including a lifting bracket (17); at least one moveable processing device (7); and a transfer system including at least one robotic arm (9) and a control system for controlling operation of the robotic arm (9); wherein: the robotic arm (9) includes an engagement tool (19), which is operable to selectively engage and release the lifting brackets (17), the robotic arm (9) is arranged to lift and move at least one receptacle (5) via the lifting bracket (17); the robotic arm (9) is arranged to move a least one processing device (7) from a storage location (35) to at least one receptacle (5); the processing device (7) is operable to process ingredients located within the receptacle (5); and the robotic arm (9) is arranged to remove the processing device (7) from the receptacle (9).