Machine-Learned Robotic Inspection for Logistics Goods Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in managing complex and voluminous data from smart devices and wearable technologies, leading to overwhelmed users and missed opportunities for insights, necessitating methods and systems to convert data into actionable insights and timely decisions.

Innovation Solution

A cloud-based management platform with a micro-services architecture, incorporating interfaces, network connectivity, adaptive intelligence, data storage, and monitoring facilities, along with robotic process automation, to manage value chain network entities from origin to customer use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual inspection processes are used, then employees can review goods, but the process is time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection speedVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection processes with an automated system comprising cameras, machine learning models, and robotic actuators. The machine learning model analyzes images captured by cameras to identify defective goods, eliminating the need for human employees to manually examine each item, thereby dramatically increasing inspection speed and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system performs self-service by automatically capturing images of goods, analyzing them through machine learning algorithms, identifying defects, and triggering removal mechanisms without human intervention. The system autonomously completes the entire inspection workflow, from data acquisition to defect identification and corrective action initiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated inspection systems are implemented, then inspection speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated inspection system is segmented into distinct functional modules: image capture devices (cameras), processing units (machine learning models), decision-making components (defect identification algorithms), and execution mechanisms (robotic actuators). This modular segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system productivity, managing complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If more employees are hired for inspection, then inspection thoroughness improves, but labor costs and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human employees with an automated machine learning-based inspection system that maintains high accuracy in identifying defective goods. The machine learning model is trained to recognize defect patterns with precision comparable to or exceeding human capability, while eliminating the time consumption associated with manual inspection processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12579500B2Supply chain good inspection utilizing machine learned robotic process automation
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019 LLC
  • US12579500B2 patent drawing
  • US12579500B2 patent drawing
  • US12579500B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A value chain system that provides recommendations for designing a logistics system generally includes a machine learning system that trains machine-learned models that output logistics design recommendations based on training data sets that each respectively defines one or more features of a respective logistic system and an outcome relating to the respective logistics system; an artificial intelligence system that receives a request for a logistics system design recommendation and determines the logistics system design recommendation based on one or more of the machine-learned models and the request; and a digital twin system that generates an environment digital twin of a logistics environment that incorporates the logistics system design recommendation, and one or more physical asset digital twins of physical assets. The digital twin system executes a simulation based on the logistics environment digital twin, the one or more physical asset digital twins.