Robotic Instrument Motion Splitting for Minimally Invasive Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic surgery systems face challenges in maneuvering surgical instruments through minimally invasive apertures without causing tissue trauma or enlarging the access site, due to excessive lateral motion and complex manual repositioning of highly configurable manipulator assemblies.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a computer-assisted approach to constrain robotic manipulator assembly motion using software and mechanical techniques, allowing axial insertion, rotation, and pivotal motion while minimizing lateral movement, and includes a processor to facilitate easy reconfiguration of the manipulator assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If robotic manipulator assembly is made highly configurable to perform intricate surgical tasks, then surgical dexterity is improved, but manual repositioning becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical dexterityVSAvoidmanual repositioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical repositioning with an automated control system. The processor receives commands and automatically adjusts the manipulator assembly's degrees of freedom, substituting complex manual mechanical operations with automated computational control. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high configurability while eliminating the complexity of manual repositioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter from manual physical adjustment to automated digital commands. By transforming the manipulator from a manually-operated mechanical system to a computer-controlled system, the patent enables intricate surgical tasks while simplifying repositioning through software-based parameter adjustment rather than manual mechanical manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If robotic manipulator allows free motion at minimally invasive aperture, then surgical instrument accessibility is improved, but tissue trauma and aperture enlargement occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument accessibilityVSAvoidtissue trauma
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the motion control into independent degrees of freedom. Each degree of freedom is controlled separately by the processor, allowing selective activation of only those motions necessary for surgical access while constraining others. This segmentation enables instrument accessibility through controlled motion while preventing tissue trauma by eliminating unnecessary lateral movements at the aperture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes motion parameters through software control. The processor adjusts the manipulator's degrees of freedom in real-time, transitioning from free motion to constrained motion as needed. This parameter control allows the system to provide instrument accessibility when required while preventing tissue trauma by constraining lateral motion at the minimally invasive aperture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manipulator assembly requires precise repositioning for different surgical tasks, then surgical precision is improved, but setup time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical precisionVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes manual mechanical repositioning with automated computational control. The processor rapidly calculates and executes precise positioning commands, replacing time-consuming manual adjustment with automated digital control. This substitution maintains surgical precision while dramatically reducing setup time between different surgical tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary computational preparation for repositioning. The processor pre-calculates the optimal configuration for upcoming surgical tasks and automatically executes the transition, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual setup. This preliminary computational action enables precise repositioning to occur rapidly, maintaining surgical precision while minimizing setup time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12496155B2Computer-assisted medical systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS INC
  • US12496155B2 patent drawing
  • US12496155B2 patent drawing
  • US12496155B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-assisted medical system includes a manipulator, an instrument holder physically coupled to the manipulator arm, and a controller that includes a computer processor. The instrument holder includes an instrument holder carriage configured to releasably couple to an instrument and translate the instrument along a longitudinal axis. The controller applies a signal that represents a movement for the instrument along the longitudinal axis to a filter to differentiate between a first and a second motion component of the movement along the longitudinal axis, and causes the instrument to move in accordance with the movement along the longitudinal axis by commanding the manipulator arm to move based on the first motion component of the movement along the longitudinal axis. The controller further commands, based on the second motion component of the movement along the longitudinal axis, the instrument holder carriage to move relative to the manipulator arm.