Robotic Interface Emulation for Multi-Device Semantic Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack efficient and adaptable methods for robotically controlling and managing multiple target devices to enhance computing capabilities and topologies in various environments.

Innovation Solution

A robotic emulation device with a processor, memory, and multimedia interfaces that captures video signals, analyzes them, and transmits manipulation control signals to emulate peripheral input devices, allowing connection to a computer host for semantic analysis and manipulation of multiple target devices, with modular components that can be grouped and composed for enhanced functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If robotic devices are used to control multiple target devices, then productivity and efficiency are improved, but device complexity and system integration difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of device controlVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic device is designed with a universal control interface that can emulate multiple peripheral input devices (keyboard, mouse, trackball, touch pad) through a single device. This multi-functionality allows one robotic device to control various types of target devices without requiring separate specialized controllers for each, thereby improving productivity while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a computer host or tenant as an intermediary that receives captured video data, performs semantic analysis, and generates manipulation commands. This intermediary layer simplifies the direct control complexity by separating the robotic device from the target devices, allowing the robotic device to focus on capture and emulation while the host handles complex decision-making and coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If video signal capture and analysis are performed for control, then adaptability and precision are improved, but processing time and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different interfacesVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing video signals continuously and maintaining a ready state for analysis. The robotic device is pre-configured with emulation capabilities for multiple interface types, so when a target device is identified, the appropriate control mode is already prepared, reducing processing delay while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from video signal analysis to dynamically adjust control strategies. By continuously monitoring the target device interface through video capture and analyzing the returned images, the system adapts its control approach in real-time, improving precision while optimizing processing time through iterative refinement rather than exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple robotic devices are grouped and composed, then functionality and control capabilities are enhanced, but system complexity and coordination difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capabilitiesVSAvoidgroup coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple robotic devices are merged into a coordinated group that functions as a unified system. The devices can be physically or logically composed to work together on complex manipulation tasks, combining their individual capabilities to achieve functions that would be difficult for a single device, while the host system manages coordination to prevent complexity escalation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments complex control tasks among multiple robotic devices, assigning specific sub-tasks to individual devices based on their capabilities and positions. This segmentation allows each device to focus on specific functions while the host coordinates the overall operation, enhancing functional capabilities without proportionally increasing coordination complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12353223B2Robotic emulation device
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 LUCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12353223B2 patent drawing
  • US12353223B2 patent drawing
  • US12353223B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic emulation device includes a processor, memory and multimedia interfaces to capture a video signal from a target device, analyze it, and transmit manipulation control signals to the target device input by emulating a peripheral input device, wherein the manipulation control signals determine manipulation or selection of a target interface control associated with a first user interface encoded and transmitted in the video signal. Furthermore, the robotic emulation device may be connected via an embedded transceiver to at least one computer or computer tenant for relaying the captured video data for analysis, and based on the analysis, applying inferred manipulation semantics.